直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

October 2020 USPTO Fee Increases: The Clock Is Ticking

September 8, 2020

Authored and Edited by Christopher C. Johns; Jill K. MacAlpine, Ph.D.

In a bit less than a month, many patent fees at the USPTO will go up across the board. While most of the fee increases are modest, the USPTO has also added a new fee important to our electronic way of life and removed some other fees.

The USPTO indicates that these fee increases are necessary to adjust to increasing costs and to provide for continued operations. Most of the changes are effective October 2, 2020. Some of the changes are discussed below. A table of all changes is available here.  

Pre-examination fees

Filing, search, and examination fees for utility applications are going up by about 5.8%.

 

Large Entity

Small Entity

Micro Entity

Filing

$300 -> $320

$150 -> $160

$75 -> $80

Search

$660 -> $700

$330 -> $350

$165 -> $175

Examination

$760 -> $800

$380 -> $400

$190 -> $200

Total

$1720 -> $1820

$860 -> $910

$430 -> $455


Design Patent and Plant Patent fees are going up by about the same amount as well. Other fees, including provisional application fees, reissue fees, extra independent claim fees (in excess of three), and fees for submission of sequence listings are going up by between 4% and 7%. 

The USPTO is introducing a new surcharge for “non-DOCX” filings. In brief, the USPTO has been tossing around the idea of charging applicants extra to file applications without using the DOCX file format (an XML-based open file format) for a few years. Practitioners commonly file applications in PDF format because it ensures that metadata can be controlled and removed before submission, and enables the application to look as it was intended to look.

It appears that the USPTO has decided the inaccuracies (and the PTO’s costs) in accepting PDF files outweigh the convenience to applicants. Needless to say, numerous organizations and individuals took issue with the PTO’s decision to impose a surcharge, citing the lack of uniformity of the DOCX format, professional liability on the part of practitioners for errors in parsing such documents, and possible implications on patent scope if the USPTO renders a document incorrectly. This fee, unlike the others, does not go into effect until January 1, 2022.

Prosecution fees

Fees incurred during prosecution are also going up. For example, the cost of an RCE is going up 5%, while extensions of time are going up by up to 10%.

 

Large Entity

Small Entity

Micro Entity

One-month Extension of Time

$200 -> $220

$100 -> $110

$50 -> $55

Two-month Extension of Time

$600 -> $640

$300 -> $320

$150 -> $160

Three-month Extension of Time

$1400 -> $1480

$700 -> $740

$350 -> $370

Four-month Extension of Time

$2200 -> $2320

$1100 -> $1160

$550 -> $580

Five-month Extension of Time

$3000 -> $3160

$1500 -> $1580

$750 -> $790

First RCE

$1300 -> $1360

$650 -> $680

$325 -> $340

Second and subsequent RCE

$1900 -> $2000

$950 -> $1000

$475 -> $500


Some other fees, such as prioritized examination (Track One) are going up as well.

 

Large Entity

Small Entity

Micro Entity

Prioritized Examination

$4000 -> $4200

$2000 -> $2100

$1000 -> $1050

Request for expedited design examination

$900 -> $1600

$450 -> $800

$225 -> $400

 

Ex parte appeal fees are rising as well.

 

Large Entity

Small Entity

Micro Entity

Notice of Appeal

$800 -> $840

$400 -> $420

$200 -> $210

Request for Oral Hearing

$1300 -> $1360

$650 -> $680

$325 -> $340

Forwarding Appeal to the Board

$2240 -> $2360

$1120 -> $1180

$560 -> $590

 

Issuance and Post-Issuance Fees

Fees for issuing and maintaining patents are rising considerably. Issue fees for utility patents are jumping by 20%, while the first maintenance fee jumps by 25% and late fees are jumping by more than 200%:

 

Large Entity

Small Entity

Micro Entity

Utility Issue Fee

$1000 -> $1200

$500 -> $600

$250 -> $300

First maintenance fee (3.5 years)

$1600 -> $2000

$800 -> $1000

$400 -> $500

Second maintenance fee (3.5 years)

$3600 -> $3760

$1800 -> $1880

$900 -> $940

Third maintenance fee (3.5 years)

$7400 -> $7700

$3700 -> $3850

$1850 -> $1925

Surcharge for late payment of maintenance fee

$160 -> $500

$80 -> $250

$40 -> 125

Certificate of Correction

$150 -> $160


Given these increases, early payment of these fees would be wise.

Miscellaneous Fees

Other fees, such as petition fees, fees to revive an abandoned application or for a delayed submission of a priority/benefit claim, or patent term fees, are going up, generally by around 5% as well. Non-prosecution fees, including fees for Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings and ex parte reexamination requests, are also going up by around 5%.

The USPTO indicated that it will not implement its long-threatened “annual active patent practitioner” fee. The new rules do require practitioners to submit a registration statement to continue active status. Failure to timely submit the statement may result in the practitioner being subject to a “delinquency fee” and administrative suspension (which may result in more fees).

Payment of fees that are due on or after October 2 prior to that time will avoid payment of the increases.

Tags

patent application, patent filing fees, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), specification

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Contacts

Christopher C. Johns
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4155
Email

Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Mere Invalidity of Asserted Claims Does Not Render Patent Infringement Case Exceptional or Warrant Sanctions

June 26, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Redesigns Done Right at the ITC: Federal Circuit Affirms ITC Determination of Noninfringement of Redesigned Products

June 26, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms Noninfringement Ruling in Hatch-Waxman Litigation Based on Claim Construction, Prosecution History Estoppel, and the Disclosure-Dedication Rule

June 26, 2026

Prosecution First Blog

USPTO Tightens “Unintentional Delay” Petitions — 1-Year Time Period Now Triggers Heightened Scrutiny

June 23, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Holds Defend Trade Secrets Act Claim Untimely Filed

June 22, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

New Informative Decision Applies the USPTO’s U.S. Manufacturing and Small Business Use of AIA Proceedings Memo

June 18, 2026

Articles

The TAKE IT DOWN Act Is Now in Full Effect: What Platforms Need to Know

June 16, 2026

Articles

The SECURE Data Act: A Federal Privacy Framework Moves Forward

June 16, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP