直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

Ex parte Mewherter: Subject Matter Eligibility of Software Media

March 01, 2016

Authored and Edited by Michelle Pacholec, Ph.D.; Adriana L. Burgy

PTAB Decision: Ex parte Mewherter, Appeal No. 2012-007692 (May 8, 2013)

Background: The technology at issue was directed to a software system for converting slide show presentations into raster imagery. The claim at issue recited “a machine readable storage medium.” Relying on PTO guidelines and Federal Circuit precedent, the Examiner rejected the claim as directed to non-statutory subject matter because it could encompass transitory signals. See Subject Matter Eligibility of Computer-Related Media Guidelines, 1351 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 212 (Feb. 23, 2010); In re Nuijten, 500 F.3d 1346, 1356-57 (holding that transitory embodiments such as signals and carrier waves are not directed to statutory subject matter). The appellants argued that “machine readable storage medium” is distinct from “machine readable medium” because the former was limited to permanently and physically stored information and thus excluded transitory signals.

Issue: Under 35 U.S.C. § 101, are computer program product terms that encompass transitory media directed to nonstatutory subject matter?

Outcome: Noting that neither the claims nor the specification expressly disclaimed such transitory media, the Board upheld the rejection and endorsed adding the limitation “non-transitory” to the claim. The Board also considered and affirmed rejections for lack of written description and obviousness.

Prosecution Takeaway: Consider whether computer product terms encompass transitory media; if so, subject matter eligibility may be raised and consider possible ways in which to disclaim or limit the inclusion of such transitory signals to avoid running afoul of § 101.

 

Tags

ex parte reexamination, patentable subject matter

Contacts

Adriana L. Burgy
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4345
Email

Copyright © 2016 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Webinar

Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement

May 18, 2026

Webinar

Panel Discussion

Global Patent Strategies & Litigation: An Exclusive Off-the-Record Conversation with Experienced In-House Leaders

May 5, 2026

London

Panel Discussion

From Junior to Expert: Building a Career in IP

April 8, 2026

London

Articles

The Interplay of Patent Term Extension (PTE) and Reissue: Merck v. Aurobindo and Its Implications, Part II

April 7, 2026

Articles

The Interplay of Patent Term Extension (PTE) and Reissue: Merck v. Aurobindo and Its Implications, Part I

April 7, 2026

IP Updates

EPR Academy: ALERT – USPTO Introduces New EPR Pre-order Procedure for Determination in Ex Parte Reexaminations

April 3, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

USPTO Introduces Patent Owner Pre-Order SNQ Briefing in EPR

April 3, 2026

Articles

Schutzschrift Thumbnail

Preempting Surprise Injunctions in Germany and the UPC: Strategic Use of the Schutzschrift in Global Patent Litigation 

March 27, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP