November 20, 2015
Authored and Edited by Gracie K. Mills; Adriana L. Burgy
Decision: In re Morsa, No. 15-1107 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 19, 2015)
Prosecution Takeaway: Applicant’s specification may be used to determine the knowledge of a person having ordinary skill in the art but not to fill gaps in the prior art.
An analysis of this decision can be found on Finnegan’s Federal Circuit IP blog here.
Copyright © 2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Webinar
Data and Market Exclusivity: An Update on China’s New Law and Comparisons to the US and Europe
November 19, 2026
Webinar
Seminar
The Augmented Practice 2026: Balancing AI Opportunity, Governance, and Risk
November 5, 2026
San Francisco
Hybrid Conference
2026 Patent Law Institute: Critical Issues & Best Practices – New York
October 29, 2026
New York
Articles
EPR Academy, Part 5 of 6: Special Considerations for Third-Party Requesters
October 14, 2026
Webinar
2026 Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches
October 14, 2026
Webinar
Articles
Who Is a “Consumer?” The Supreme Court Takes Up the Video Privacy Protection Act
October 12, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.