November 20, 2015
Authored and Edited by Gracie K. Mills; Adriana L. Burgy
Decision: In re Morsa, No. 15-1107 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 19, 2015)
Prosecution Takeaway: Applicant’s specification may be used to determine the knowledge of a person having ordinary skill in the art but not to fill gaps in the prior art.
An analysis of this decision can be found on Finnegan’s Federal Circuit IP blog here.
Copyright © 2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Conference
Finnegan IP Summit 2026: Celebrating an Inclusive Talent Pipeline
August 11-13, 2026
Washington, DC
Webinar
Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights
July 15, 2026
Webinar
Federal Circuit IP Blog
July 8, 2026
Articles
When the Classroom Goes Dark: Lessons from the Canvas Breach for Corporate Cyber Preparedness
July 8, 2026
Webinar
Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches
July 8, 2026
Webinar
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.