直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

Cancer Immunotherapy Pilot Program Set to Expire in June Unless Extended

June 06, 2017

Authored and Edited by Rachael P. Dippold, Ph.D.; Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.

Last year, President Obama announced the National Cancer Moonshot, an initiative with the goal of making ten years’ worth of advances in cancer research and treatment over the following five years.  In support of this initiative, the USPTO announced its “Patents 4 Patients” program, also known as the Cancer Immunotherapy Pilot Program.  Through this pilot program, which began June 29, 2016, applications directed to cancer immunotherapy are provided special status for examination, with the goal of completing prosecution within 12 months of the grant of special status. 

To qualify for the pilot program, an application must contain at least one claim encompassing “a method of ameliorating, treating, or preventing a malignancy” such that “the steps of the method assist or boost the immune system in eradicating cancerous cells.”  81 Fed. Reg. 42328 (29 June 2016).  The applicant must also file a petition to participate in the Cancer Immunotherapy Pilot Program via EFS-Web using form PTO/SB/443.  There is no fee to petition to make special under this program and there are no restrictions on who may apply for the program (e.g., universities vs. biotech companies) or where the technology was developed or produced.

The application must be a non-reissue application and cannot have been granted special status through any other program (e.g., Patent Prosecution Highway, Track One, or Accelerated Examination).  In most cases, the petition to make special must be filed before receipt of an office action, including restriction requirement, in a new application or an in an application having a proper request for continued examination.  However, special provisions apply for applications in which the claimed therapy is the subject of an Investigational New Drug application filed with the Federal Drug Administration that has entered phase II or phase III clinical trials.  In such cases, a petition to make special can be filed at any time before a final office action or an appeal.

Like with other special status programs, certain requirements must be met in order to maintain special status during prosecution.  For example, at no time may the application have more than three independent claims and 20 claims in total.  Additionally, taking an extension of time to respond to an office action will terminate special status of the application.  Special status is also terminated when a final office action issues or a notice of appeal or request for continued examination is filed.

Unless the USPTO extends the Cancer Immunotherapy Pilot Program, petitions to make special via this program must be filed before June 29, 2017.  Additional information regarding this program can be found in the Federal Register Notice.

Tags

Automated Interview Request, compact prosecution

Related Practices

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Contacts

Rachael_Dippold
Rachael P. Dippold, Ph.D.
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4063
Email
Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2814
Email

Copyright © 2017 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Charitable

Banding Together 2026

June 18, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Claim Disclaimer Derails Instituted IPR in Freightcar America

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP