直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Stakeholders Enjoy Streamlined Exemption Renewal Process During Seventh DMCA 1201 Rulemaking

December 11, 2018

Authored and Edited by Samuel V. Eichner; Margaret A. Esquenet

On October 26, 2018, the Library of Congress adopted exemptions to the prohibitions in 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1)(A), which prohibits circumvention of technological measures that control access to copyrighted works.  Such exemptions are intended to address situations where the access controls in § 1201(a)(1)(A) impair certain individuals’ ability to make noninfringing uses of copyrighted works.  Specifically, § 1201(a)(1)(C) requires the Library of Congress, upon recommendation of the Office, to examine and adopt exemptions based on the following factors:

  1. the availability for use of copyrighted works;
  2. the availability for use of works for nonprofit archival, preservation, and educational purposes;
  3. the impact that the prohibition on the circumvention of technological measures applied to copyrighted works has on criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research;
  4. the effect of circumvention of technological measures on the market for or value of copyrighted works; and
  5. such other factors as the Librarian considers appropriate.

In response to stakeholder concerns, the Office employed a streamlined exemption renewal process, no longer requiring stakeholders to develop a new factual record for pre-existing exemptions every three years.  Instead, the Office will now consider evidence submitted in prior rulemakings, supported by contemporaneous signed declarations that such evidence remains relevant and valid.  If there is meaningful opposition to a renewal, the Office will notice written comment and public hearing to update the administrative record on the proposed exemptions.   

Tags

Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Copyright © 2018 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. 
Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Lecture

Munich Licensing Summer Course 2026

June 18-19, 2026

Munich

Articles

California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data

June 4, 2026

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Articles

COPPA’s Amended Rule Is Now in Full Effect: What Operators Need to Know

May 15, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

When “and” and “e.g.” Matter: Federal Circuit Revives VLSI vs. Intel Case

May 14, 2026

IP Updates

Tenth Circuit Sides with Netflix in Tiger King Copyright Challenge 

May 5, 2026

Articles

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update, March 2026

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: March 2026

May 4, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP