直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Stakeholders Enjoy Streamlined Exemption Renewal Process During Seventh DMCA 1201 Rulemaking

December 11, 2018

Authored and Edited by Samuel V. Eichner; Margaret A. Esquenet

On October 26, 2018, the Library of Congress adopted exemptions to the prohibitions in 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1)(A), which prohibits circumvention of technological measures that control access to copyrighted works.  Such exemptions are intended to address situations where the access controls in § 1201(a)(1)(A) impair certain individuals’ ability to make noninfringing uses of copyrighted works.  Specifically, § 1201(a)(1)(C) requires the Library of Congress, upon recommendation of the Office, to examine and adopt exemptions based on the following factors:

  1. the availability for use of copyrighted works;
  2. the availability for use of works for nonprofit archival, preservation, and educational purposes;
  3. the impact that the prohibition on the circumvention of technological measures applied to copyrighted works has on criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research;
  4. the effect of circumvention of technological measures on the market for or value of copyrighted works; and
  5. such other factors as the Librarian considers appropriate.

In response to stakeholder concerns, the Office employed a streamlined exemption renewal process, no longer requiring stakeholders to develop a new factual record for pre-existing exemptions every three years.  Instead, the Office will now consider evidence submitted in prior rulemakings, supported by contemporaneous signed declarations that such evidence remains relevant and valid.  If there is meaningful opposition to a renewal, the Office will notice written comment and public hearing to update the administrative record on the proposed exemptions.   

Tags

Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Copyright © 2018 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. 
Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Articles

California Brings First CCPA and Delete Act Enforcement Action Against Data Broker

September 4, 2026

European IP Blog

The Decision in G 1/25: A More Relaxed Approach to Description Amendments in Europe?

3 September 2026

Webinar

A Year of Change for Post-Grant Patent Challenges: Key PTAB and CRU Developments, and Strategic Implications

August 19, 2026

Webinar

At the PTAB Blog

Squires Issues Precedential Decision Clarifying Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Rejections

August 17, 2026

Articles

Privacy Law Mid-Year Update: Key EU and UK Data Protection Decisions

August 13, 2026

Articles

Court Upholds MillerKnoll Ownership of Iconic Bubble Lamp Design

August 13, 2026

European IP Blog

UPC Action Permissibly Lodged Prior to the Grant of a European Patent

12 August 2026

Conference

Finnegan IP Summit 2026: Celebrating an Inclusive Talent Pipeline

August 11-13, 2026

Washington, DC

Articles

Blaker v. NetScout Systems: A Narrow Reading of the Pen Register and Trap and Trace Provisions of the California Invasion of Privacy Act in California State Court

July 29, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP