直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

FTC Pumps the Brakes on Auto Parts Manufacturer's Unsubstantiated Claims

May 7, 2020

Authored and Edited by Nicholas Camillo; Margaret A. Esquenet

The Federal Trade Commission issued a proposed order settling its complaint against Federal-Mogul Motorparts LLC regarding its allegedly unsubstantiated braking performance claims displayed in advertisements and promotional materials. The order requires Federal-Mogul to properly support its claims with competent and reliable scientific evidence. 

Federal-Mogul manufactures aftermarket auto parts and offers its Wagner OEX brake pads for use on crossover utility vehicles, SUVs, and pickup trucks. The claims at issue touted the alleged superior performance and safety of Federal-Mogul’s aftermarket Wagner OEX brake pads, as compared to competitors’ brake pads. The FTC alleged that Federal-Mogul’s advertisements and promotional materials for the Wagner OEX brake pads falsely claimed that the pads would (1) stop a vehicle significantly sooner than competing brake pads, and (2) reduce the risk of collisions as compared to competing brake pads.

Specifically, a video ad depicted an SUV avoiding a crash and included the following narrated statement:

“Wagner OEX brake pads can stop you up to 50 feet sooner.  Do you know what’s on your vehicle?”

Similarly, a print ad depicted a family standing in front of a crashed SUV and an intact SUV with the following statement:

“Wagner OEX brake pads can stop your truck, SUV, or crossover up to 50 feet sooner than other leading pads.* It can mean 50 feet saved when you need it most.  And when you family’s safety is on the line, isn’t that what really matters?” 

Federal-Mogul hired an independent company to conduct head-to-head testing of the Wagner OEX brake pads against competing pads, and included a disclaimer in its ads noting same. According to the FTC, however, the statements made in the ads were not properly substantiated because the testing did not simulate real-world driving conditions. The testing required a driver to apply a constant and relatively light force to a brake pedal to stop a vehicle in “the shortest distance achievable” (also known as a “best-effort” stop). The brake pads were, however, tested only after they had reached a set temperature above normal driving conditions. Heated brake pads result in longer stopping distances, and thus require greater pedal force to stop in the shortest achievable distance.  Therefore, the pedal force applied in the testing failed to evaluate a realistic amount of pressure that a driver would need to apply to avoid an accident.

Federal-Mogul agreed to settle the complaint, and the FTC issued a proposed order which required that any future performance claims be substantiated by qualified researchers using standards generally accepted by experts in the field of automobile brakes.

The case is In re Federal-Mogul Motoparts LLC, FTC No. 172-3102 (2020).

Tags

Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Advertising

Related Industries

Transportation and Logistics

Automotive and Smart Mobility Tech

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. 
Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Lecture

Munich Licensing Summer Course 2026

June 18-19, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

Articles

California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data

June 4, 2026

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP