直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Federal Circuit IP Blog

The Federal Circuit Awards New Trial on Damages

September 21, 2021

Authored and Edited by Shannon M. Patrick; Kara A. Specht; Elizabeth D. Ferrill

In Omega Patents, LLC v. CalAmp Corp, No. 20-1793 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2021), the Federal Circuit reviewed several appealed issues including an award of damages.

At the district court’s trial, the jury awarded Omega $5.00-per-unit royalty, totaling $4,586,110. CalAmp appealed.

On appeal, the Federal Circuit concluded the district court abused its discretion in denying CalAmp’s request for a new trial on damages. The Court found two reasons warranting a new trial. First, the district court precluded CalAmp’s damages expert from offering rebuttal testimony, which was an abuse of discretion when Omega’s original Daubert motion had not addressed his qualifications as a damages expert. Second, the Court found that the jury’s award of damages was unsubstantiated. Although the patent covered the entire infringing product, as a matter of law Omega was required to apportion between the improved and conventional features of the accused product, which the Court found it failed to do. Supporting its royalty rate Omega offered eighteen licenses. Each of the offered licenses involved multiple patents, but Omega was unable to distinguish the single-patent royalty at issue from the exemplary multi-patent licenses. Therefore, the Federal Circuit determined the district court abused its discretion in denying CalAmp a new damages trial and remanded for further proceedings.

Tags

damages, Judgment as a Matter of Law (JMOL), infringement, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Communications

Internet of Things (IoT)

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Contacts

Shannon M. Patrick
Associate
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6558
Email
Kara A. Specht
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6481
Email
Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email

Copyright © 2021 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Claim Disclaimer Derails Instituted IPR in Freightcar America

May 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP