March 31, 2022
Authored and Edited by Jordan M. Gringauz; Gracie K. Mills; Esther H. Lim; Elizabeth D. Ferrill
The following arguments will be available to the public live. Access information will be available by 9 AM ET each day of argument at: https://cafc.uscourts.gov/home/oral-argument/listen-to-oral-arguments/.
United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”) holds patents relating to a mobile check depositing application. Mitek licenses its own mobile check depositing application, called MiSnapTM, to customers that include banks and financial institutions. In November 2019, Mitek sued USAA in the Northern District of California, seeking a declaratory judgment that Mitek does not infringe USAA’s patents. The case was transferred to the Eastern District of Texas, where the court dismissed the complaint on the basis that Mitek lacks standing to bring this declaratory judgment action.
On appeal, Mitek argues it has standing to bring the declaratory judgment action. Under the 5thCircuit case Choice Inc. of Texas v. Greenstein, it argues, the district court must accept as true the allegations in Mitek’s complaint. According to Mitek, accepting these allegations as true, Mitek’s complaint established standing for its declaratory judgment action. In particular, Mitek asserts that its complaint alleged facts sufficient to establish a supplier’s standing for declaratory judgment under the standard set forth in Arris Grp., Inc. v. British Telecommunications, PLC.
USAA responds that Mitek relies on the incorrect legal standard. Under Dow Jones & Co. v. Ablasie Ltd, USAA argues that Mitek bears the burden of proving the existence of a substantial controversy between the parties, and that the district court is not required to accept the allegations in Mitek’s complaint as true. Rather, USAA asserts the 5thCircuit held in Montez v Department of Navy that “where subject matter jurisdiction is being challenged, the trial court is free to weigh the evidence and resolve factual disputes in order to satisfy itself that it has the power to hear the case.” It argues that where the defendant challenges the facts alleged in the complaint, as USAA did here, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to prove the existence of subject matter jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence by submitting facts through some evidentiary method, citing Superior MRI Services v. Alliance Healthcare Services. According to USAA, Mitek cannot rely on the presumptive truthfulness of its allegations on appeal. Rather, it argues that Mitek must demonstrate clear error in the district court’s finding that no standing exists, citing In re Recycling, L.L.C.
Final Written Decision, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
Copyright © 2022 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
April 19, 2024
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
April 4, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.