直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Trends of 2016

December 29, 2016

Authored and Edited by Eric P. Raciti; Alissa K. Lipton; Elizabeth D. Ferrill; Lauren J. Dreyer

Join us as we review what has been an exciting year at the Federal Circuit and help ring in 2017 with a New Year's reception at Finnegan’s Boston office on Wednesday, January 11, 2017! We will provide insights on the top Federal Circuit decisions and trends of 2016.

Below, we highlight some of the issues we will discuss on January 11:

Venue Statute

On December 14, 2016, the Supreme Court granted cert. in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Food Brands Group LLC (16-341), a case that may significantly impact the determination of venue in patent infringement suits.  The issue to be decided is whether the federal patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), is the sole and exclusive provision controlling venue in patent infringement actions, or whether it is supplemented by the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c), the general corporate venue statute.

The Federal Circuit has held that the definition of corporate residence from the general corporate venue statute applies to the patent venue statute.  As a result, currently, a corporation in a patent infringement suit is deemed to reside in any judicial district in which it is subject to personal jurisdiction at the time the action is commenced.  If the Supreme Court were to agree with the petitioners and reverse the Federal Circuit’s holding, however, proper venue in a patent litigation suit may be limited to the defendant corporation’s state of incorporation only.

Post-Williamson Developments in Functional Claiming

The use of functional language in patent claims to describe what something does, rather than what it is, has been a point of controversy since the mid-19th century.  The landscape is always changing, but many traps for the unwary have been among us for decades.  Understanding the contours of the proper legal interpretation of functional claim language helps the prosecutor and the litigator alike to recognize opportunities and pitfalls that come with functional descriptions in patent claims.

To learn more about the trends and key cases of 2016, or to register to attend, click here.

Tags

infringement, personal jurisdiction, patent venue

Contacts

Eric P. Raciti
Partner
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1675
Email
Alissa K. Lipton
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4293
Email
Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email

Copyright © 2016 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Charitable

2026 ALYN Hospital Wheels of Love Ride

November 8-12, 2026

Northern District

Conference

2026 ANA Masters of Advertising Law Conference

November 2-4, 2026

Huntington Beach

Lecture

2026 Donald R. Dunner Endowed Lecture

October 27, 2026

Washington, DC

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Conference

2026 FCBA Global Series Fall Session

October 14-16, 2026

Dublin

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Articles

California Brings First CCPA and Delete Act Enforcement Action Against Data Broker

September 4, 2026

European IP Blog

The Decision in G 1/25: A More Relaxed Approach to Description Amendments in Europe?

3 September 2026

Webinar

A Year of Change for Post-Grant Patent Challenges: Key PTAB and CRU Developments, and Strategic Implications

August 19, 2026

Webinar

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP