September 28, 2017
Authored and Edited by Christina Ji-Hye Yang; Lillian R. Phares; Elizabeth D. Ferrill
In Allied Mineral Products, Inc. v. OSMI, Inc., No. 2016-2641, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Southern Florida district court’s dismissal of a declaratory judgment action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Allied failed to show “a case of actual controversy.”
OSMI and Stellar (“Stellar”) brought a patent infringement lawsuit in Mexico against Allied’s Mexican distributors, alleging that they infringed Stellar’s Mexican patent. Allied then filed a request for declaratory judgment in the U.S., requesting the district court find non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability of Stellar’s U.S. patent.
The Federal Circuit held that Stellar’s infringement action filed in Mexico does not constitute an affirmative act to meet the actual controversy requirement. The Federal Circuit emphasized that all of Stellar’s conduct was limited to the infringement action in Mexico based on the Mexican patent and was only directed against the Mexican entities.
Furthermore, the Federal Circuit held that a lawsuit against Allied’s distributors alone does give Allied standing to seek declaratory judgment. Manufacturer standing is appropriate only if the manufacturer is obligated to indemnify its customers or the manufacturer is subject to liability for induced or contributory infringement. Neither element was met in this case. The Federal Circuit thus affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Copyright © 2017 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
At the PTAB Blog
USPTO Releases Notice of Proposed Rule Making Codifying Several Precedential Case Factors
April 25, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.