直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms Wireless Communication Patent Not Essential or Infringed

September 8, 2022

Authored and Edited by Yinan Liu, Ph.D.; Caitlin E. Fowler; Elizabeth D. Ferrill

In INVT SPE LLC v. International Trade Commission, No. 2020-1903 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2022), the Federal Circuit affirmed the International Trade Commission’s (“ITC”) determination that the respondents did not violate 19 U.S.C. § 1337.

INVT alleged that the importation and sale of LTE-compliant personal electronic devices infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 6,760,590 (“the ’590 patent”) and 7,848,439 (“the ’439 patent”).  The ITC determined that the asserted claims were not essential to the LTE standard and that the accused products did not infringe the asserted claims.

The Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC’s determination with respect to the ’439 patent. First, the Court found that INVT had failed to establish infringement of the asserted claims. The Court acknowledged that the asserted claims only required that a device be capable of performing the claimed functions but found that INVT had failed to show the accused devices performed the claimed functions when put into operation. Second, the Court found that the asserted claims were not standard essential because not every LTE-compliant compliant device performed the claimed functions. With respect to the ’590 patent, the Federal Circuit held that the appeal was moot because the ’590 patent had expired, and the ITC can only grant prospective relief.  

Tags

direct infringement, International Trade Commission (ITC)

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Related Offices

Boston, MA

Washington, DC

Contacts

Yinan Liu, Ph.D.
Associate
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1652
Email
Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email

Copyright © 2022 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. 
Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Seminar

Future IP UK

October 21, 2026

London

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Conference

IAM Live: SEP Summit Global 2026

September 9-10, 2026

London

Lecture

Resolving Patent Suits Without Settlement Payments

September 3, 2026

Virtual

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP