直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

USPTO Introduces Online Form to Nominate PTAB Decisions as Precedential or Informative

September 28, 2020

Authored and Edited by Jessica L. Roberts, Ph.D.; Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.

On September 24, 2020, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board announced a new online form that allows members of the public to anonymously nominate any routine decision of the Board for designation as precedential or informative.  Every opinion is, by default, a routine opinion and has no binding authority on the Board until it is designated otherwise.

The form, available on the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s website, requires a case name and number, paper number, and a brief explanation for nominating the decision as precedential or informative.  The form also includes optional fields for name and email address.

The PTAB considers precedential decisions to be those establishing binding authority concerning major policy or procedural issues, including constitutional questions and issues regarding statutes, rules, regulations, and case law.  An informative decision, on the other hand, provides Board norms on recurring issues, guidance on issues of first impression, and guidance on Board rules and practice.  A Precedential Opinion Panel (“POP”), consisting of the Director, the Commissioner for Patents, and the Chief Judge, operate to decide these issues of exceptional importance.

Before the online form was implemented, an individual had to make a request in writing within 60 days of issuance of an opinion to the Chief Judge.  The Chief Judge had to respond in writing to confirm receipt of the request.  The new online form should streamline the process for nominating a decision as precedential or informative and encourage members of the public to make such a nomination.

For a complete list of precedential and informative decisions, the USPTO provides a link of decisions organized by subject matter.

Tags

America Invents Act (AIA), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Contacts

Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2814
Email

Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Webinar

U.S. Patent Case Law Update 2026

July 23, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates and Remands Infringement and Damages Judgment After Erroneous Verdict Form and Eligibility Analysis

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for March–May 2026

July 2, 2026

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 4 of 6: Choosing Between EPR, IPR, PGR, and Reissue

July 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Deadline Evolution: Director Extends Deadline for Requesting Director Review of Institution Grants to 30 Days

June 30, 2026

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: May 2026

June 30, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP