November 25, 2013
Authored and Edited by Aaron L. Parker
On November 13, 2013, the PTAB issued its first final written decision in an IPR. Garmin International, Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC, Case IPR2012-00001. For Garmin, the petitioner, the decision was a resounding success, which resulted in the cancellation of every claim challenged in Garmin’s petition. In the coming weeks, we will analyze and discuss several intriguing aspects of the PTAB’s decision in a three-part series. In Part 1, we consider the PTAB’s denial of Cuozzo’s motion to amend the challenged claims. In Part 2, we discuss the PTAB’s determination that evidence provided by Cuozzo failed to swear behind the cited prior art references. Finally, in Part 3, we weigh-in on the PTAB’s willingness to affirm Garmin’s proposed four-reference obviousness rejection.
Copyright © 2013 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.
At the PTAB Blog
Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a
§ 325(d) EPR Denial
May 28, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.