May 26, 2016
Authored and Edited by David C. Seastrunk; Elliot C. Cook; Daniel F. Klodowski; Aaron L. Parker
In the 46 Final Written Decisions issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in April, the Board cancelled 651 (88.45%) of the instituted claims and declined to cancel 51 (6.93%) of the instituted claims. Patent owners conceded 34 (4.62%) of the instituted claims through motions to amend or disclaimer. These decision outcomes are considerably worse for patentees than the decisions issued in March 2016, when 65% of all instituted claims were cancelled and nearly 30% of instituted claims survived.

On a per-case basis, no instituted or substitute claims survived in 38 (82.61%) of the decisions, all instituted claims survived in only 2 (4.35%) of the decisions, and a mixed outcome occurred in 6 (13.04%) of the decisions. A mixed outcome occurs where at least one instituted or substitute claim remains patentable, and at least one is cancelled, in a Final Written Decision. These decisions were also significantly less favorable to patentees than the decisions issued in March 2016, where no instituted claims survived in 66.67% of cases and all instituted claims survived in 28.57% of cases.

The following resources are also available on the AIA Blog:
Various other PTAB metrics collected and generated by Finnegan are reserved for the use of Finnegan and its clients.
Copyright © 2016 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.
Articles
California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data
June 4, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a
§ 325(d) EPR Denial
May 28, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.