直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

IPR, CBM, and PGR Statistics for PTAB Final Written Decisions Through September 2022

November 22, 2022

Authored and Edited by Daniel F. Klodowski; Umber Aggarwal; Matthew R. Ritter; Aaron L. Parker; Elliot C. Cook

Editor’s note: 

After a long hiatus, Finnegan is pleased to resume publishing statistics on PTAB Final Written Decision outcomes in addition to statistics on PTAB appeals to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  This post provides cumulative statistics through the end of September, and in the future, we will resume publishing monthly statistics for PTAB decisions.

Through September, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued 4,274 Final Written Decisions across IPR, CBM, and PGR proceedings, including decisions following remands from the Federal Circuit.  In these decisions, no instituted or substitute claims survived in 2,704 (63.27%) decisions, all instituted claims survived in 785 (18.37%) decisions, and a mixed outcome occurred in 785 (18.37%) decisions.  A mixed outcome occurs where at least one instituted or substitute claim remains patentable, and at least one is cancelled, in a Final Written Decision. 

On a per-claim basis, the Board cancelled 45,921 (72.97%) instituted claims, while 15,589 (24.77%) instituted claims survived all patentability challenges.  Patent owners conceded 1,422 (2.26%) instituted claims through motions to amend or disclaimer in cases that otherwise reached a Final Written Decision.  This overall disposition rate has remained steady at the PTAB over the past several years.

IPR proceedings represent the vast majority of PTAB Final Written Decisions.  Patent Owners have fared slightly better in IPR proceedings than in CBM and PGR proceedings (collectively), with 41,127 (71.49%) instituted claims being cancelled, 15,158 (26.35%) instituted claims surviving, and 1,242 (2.16%) instituted claims being conceded in cases reaching a final decision.

On a per-case basis, 2,467 (61.81%) IPR decisions resulted in no instituted or substitute claims surviving, 758 (18.99%) decisions resulted in a mixed outcome in which at least one instituted or substitute claim survived, and 766 (19.19%) decisions resulted in all instituted claims surviving.

The Board has substantively considered the patentability of 3,348 substitute claims in Patent Owners’ motions to amend.  In ruling on those motions, the Board has granted 565 (16.88%) substitute claims and denied (i.e., held unpatentable) 2,783 (83.12%) substitute claims.

While the availability of CBM reviews ended in late 2020, the number of PGR proceedings has gradually increased over time.  In the 80 PGR decisions issued thus far, no claims survived in 51 (63.75%) of decisions, a mixed outcome occurred in 13 (16.25%) decisions, and all instituted claims survived in 16 (20%) decisions.

On a per-claim basis, 1,024 (75.18%) instituted claims were held unpatentable by the PTAB in PGRs, 291 (21.37%) instituted claims survived PGR review, and 47 (3.45%) instituted claims were conceded by Patent Owners in cases that otherwise reached a final decision.

The overall cumulative instituted claim survival rate in IPRs, CBMs, and PGRs, broken down by technology center, is as follows:

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Washington, DC

Contacts

Daniel F. Klodowski
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4216
Email
Umber Aggarwal
Associate
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2423
Email
Aaron L. Parker
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4387
Email
Elliot C. Cook
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2738
Email

Copyright © 2022 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Lecture

Resolving Patent Suits Without Settlement Payments

September 3, 2026

Virtual

Conference

13th Annual Summit for Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law

July 29-30, 2026

Boston

Webinar

U.S. Patent Case Law Update 2026

July 23, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates and Remands Infringement and Damages Judgment After Erroneous Verdict Form and Eligibility Analysis

July 8, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP