直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Trademark Licensing

January 2020

2020 Licensing Update

By B. Brett Heavner; Yinfei Wu; Jessica L. Hannah

Trademark licensing is the process by which a trademark owner (i.e., the licensor) allows another (i.e., the licensee) to make, sell, and distribute goods or services under the licensor's trademark. It is one of the most effective ways to maximize the value of and expand geographically the goodwill associated with licensor's trademark. In 2019, the United States Supreme Court issued a much-anticipated opinion in a trademark licensing and bankruptcy case. The Fifth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuit Courts addressed various important issues relating to trademark licensing agreements. The Southern District of New York and the Central District of California had trademark licensing decisions to make that attracted much attention. In this chapter, Finnegan attorneys Brett Heavner, Yinfei Wu, and Jessica Hannah review these prominent 2019 trademark licensing cases addressing naked licensing and quality control, terms and termination, standing and jurisdiction, licensee estoppel, and the effect of bankruptcy on licensing.

Downloadable Files

  • PUBLISHED - 2020 Licensing Update_Chapter 2 Trademark Licensing

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

B. Brett Heavner
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4073
Email
Yinfei Wu
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4428
Email

Originally printed in 2020 Licensing Update in January 2020. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

IAM Live: SEP Summit Global 2026

September 9-10, 2026

London

Seminar

IAM and WTR Live: Australasia IP Forum 2026

August 11, 2026

Melbourne

Conference

2026 China Pharmaceutical Innovation Conference

July 22-24, 2026

Shanghai

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Articles

When the Classroom Goes Dark: Lessons from the Canvas Breach for Corporate Cyber Preparedness

July 8, 2026

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 4 of 6: Choosing Between EPR, IPR, PGR, and Reissue

July 1, 2026

Articles

How Low Can You Go? Courts Lower Marking Defense Burden, Raising Patent Damages Risks

June 29, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP