September/October 2020
IP Litigator
Under the Federal Rules, discovery is limited to nonprivileged material that is both “relevant to any party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case.” According to the rules, when addressing the proportionality requirement courts should consider “the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount in controversy, the parties’ relative access to relevant information, the parties’ resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit.” In this article, Finnegan attorneys Dan Cooley and Brandon Andersen discuss the factors to consider when determining whether a given discovery request is proportional to the needs of the case including the importance of an issue, the adequacy of alternative discovery measures, and the privacy concerns involved.
Read the full article here.
Reprinted with permission from the IP Litigator, published by Wolters Kluwer. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm's clients.
Hybrid Conference
Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California
October 19-20, 2026
San Francisco
Hybrid Conference
Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York
September 28-29, 2026
New York
Webinar
Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights
July 15, 2026
Webinar
Webinar
Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches
July 8, 2026
Webinar
Federal Circuit IP Blog
July 8, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
July 8, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.