August 1, 2020
LES Insights
By John C. Paul; D. Brian Kacedon; Anthony D. Del Monaco; Daniel G. Chung
A Georgia court awarded attorney fees and costs to a defendant who prevailed in a patent infringement suit on summary judgment. The patent owner's offer to settle the dispute by waiving its right to appeal after losing did not prevent the defendant from recovering its attorneys' fees and costs incurred after rejecting that offer including the fees and costs incurred in pursuing its claim for attorneys' fees and costs.
After Energy Innovation sued NCR for patent infringement and lost, the trial court directed NCR to submit a motion that Energy Innovation pay NCR's attorneys' fees for the litigation. In response, Energy Innovation offered to waive its right to appeal if NCR would not pursue a claim for its attorneys' fees, but NCR refused and proceeded with its request for fees.
To determine the amount of fees to award NCR, the trial court had to determine whether the number of attorney hours for which NCR sought compensation was reasonable. Among other arguments, Energy Innovation asserted that the trial court should not award any attorneys' fees incurred by NCR after Energy Innovation's offer to waive its appeal rights. The trial court disagreed and awarded NCR its attorneys' fees incurred after Energy Innovation's offer, including the fees for time spent in preparing its motion for attorneys' fees. Energy Innovation cited no authority to support its argument, and NCR was entirely reasonable in pursuing its counterclaims and efforts to be made whole.
An offer to waive appeal rights or providing other types of settlement offers after a party has already prevailed in litigation may not be sufficient to argue against an attorneys' fees award accrued after the date of such offer.
The Energy Innovation decision can be found here.
Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
Webinar
Building a Strong ADC Patent Portfolio – From Prosecution and Litigation Perspectives
May 15, 2024
Webinar
Workshop
Life Sciences Workshop: Updates and Key Trends in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology IP Law
May 2, 2024
Cambridge
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
Courts and Legislators Addressing the Right of Publicity in the Age of AI
April 30, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.