直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

IP Considerations for the Food and Beverage Industry Series: Patenting Natural Products Used in Unnatural Ways

December 11, 2018

By Alyssa J. Holtslander; Virginia L. Carron

As an increased emphasis is placed on protecting our environment and animal welfare, companies aim to make traditionally animal-derived products from sustainable natural materials and processes. When a natural item is processed or put to a new use, the results may be patentable. For example, companies are attempting to produce high quality faux leathers using natural materials such as cork, mushrooms, and pineapple leaves, with processes that have minimal impact on the environment. These products may be used in luxury fashion products or vehicle car seats. Even though these products are made from natural materials, the products and the methods for making the products may still be patentable.

This may seem contrary to prevailing case law where the Supreme Court stated, in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 133 S. Ct. 2107 (2013), that naturally occurring products are unpatentable. And the Federal Circuit has ruled that claims to products that are “not distinguishable from” their natural counterparts are not patent-eligible, regardless of how they were made. See In re BRCA1- & BRCA2-Based Hereditary Cancer Test Patent Litig., 774 F.3d 755 (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Nonetheless, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued a set of “Nature-Based Products” examples detailing the types of products that may be patentable. Specifically, the USPTO examples suggest that if the nature-based product or composition has “markedly different characteristics from any naturally occurring counterpart(s) in their natural state,” such products or compositions may be eligible for patent protection. USPTO, Nature-Based Product Examples (Dec. 16, 2014) at 1. Furthermore, the USPTO memorandum suggests that a patent may be granted when the “claim as a whole indicates that the claim is focused on the assembly of components that together form the [product], and not the nature-based products.” Id.

The burden to show whether the product made from natural materials is patent-eligible rests on the patent applicant. Thus, the applicant should take these standards into account when preparing a patent application. Specifically, the applicant should include in the patent specification a detailed description of how the invention has “markedly different characteristics” from its “naturally occurring counterpart(s).” In addition, the applicant may consider filing claims related to a product, a product-by-process, and/or a method, for example, directed to the “markedly different” invention. 

As concerns regarding the environment and animal welfare increase, consumers are likely to prefer buying sustainable products, increasing demand for these products. This demand will drive companies to seek to use sustainable natural materials in their products (and sustainable methods to make their products). Thus, it will be increasingly important for those companies to carefully analyze whether their products contain patent-eligible subject matter and prepare patent applications that enhance the likelihood of obtaining patent protection for these valuable products.

Click here to read the other articles in our series.

Tags

Article Series: IP Considerations for the Food and Beverage Industry, patent-eligible, natural products

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Related Industries

Food and Beverage

Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Reston, VA

Related Professionals

Virginia L. Carron
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6452
Email

Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Seminar

3rd AI, IP, & Legal Forum

June 6, 2026

Shangai

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Conference

19th Annual Forum on Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation in Europe

May 19-20, 2026

Amsterdam

Virtual Seminar

Patent "Basics" Seminar

May 19, 2026

Virtual

Seminar

IP Strategy at the Crossroads: Technology, Enforcement, and Contracts

May 15, 2026

Taipei

Webinar

Implementation of Long-Arm Jurisdiction by the UPC Court and German National Courts: Strategic Considerations and Practical Implications

May 12, 2026

Webinar

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP