直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Insights from the First Year of the USPTO’s New Motion to Amend Pilot Program

July 12, 2021

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

By Brooke M Wilner; Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.

Andrei Iancu, Director of the American Intellectual Property Law Association’s 2018 annual meeting, has repeatedly stated his desire to give patent owners greater ability to amend claims during AIA trial proceedings. In March 2019, the USPTO took a step in that direction with its pilot program for motion to amend practice. An eligible patent owner who chooses to take advantage of the pilot program can receive valuable preliminary guidance from the Board on its motion to amend, and, if desired, can file a revised motion to amend based on that feedback. Eighteen months after the pilot program’s launch, only a handful of eligible trials have reached final disposition at the Board. In this article, we take a close look at each of these cases to analyze whether and how the Board’s preliminary guidance has impacted their outcome—and provide strategic practice tips for both petitioners and patent owners.

Read the full version of "Insights from the First Year of the USPTO’s New Motion to Amend Pilot Program" here. 

Tags

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), motions to amend (MTA), America Invents Act (AIA)

Downloadable Files

  • PUBLISHED - Chicago-Kent Journal of IP - Insights from the First Year of the USPTOs New Motion to Amend - AKM BMW - 07.12.21

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2814
Email

Originally published in Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property on July 12, 2021.  This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

2027 ABA-IPL Section Annual Meeting – IPLSPRING

April 14-15, 2027

Arlington

Conference

Patent Litigation Europe 2027

January 18-20, 2027

Amsterdam

Conference

IP Life Sciences Forum 2026

December 13-15, 2026

Coral Gables

Conference

Atlantic Basin Conference on Chemistry 2026

December 6-9, 2026

Rio de Janeiro

Panel Discussion

2026 Advanced Patent Law Institute

December 3-4, 2026

Stanford

Webinar

Data and Market Exclusivity: An Update on China’s New Law and Comparisons to the US and Europe

November 19, 2026

Webinar

Conference

NAPABA Convention 2026

November 12-14, 2026

Los Angeles

Conference

Broad's 3rd Annual Biotech IP Summit

November 10, 2026

Cambridge

Conference

IAM Live: Trade Secret Strategy USA

November 10, 2026

San Jose

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP