直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Insights from the First Year of the USPTO’s New Motion to Amend Pilot Program

July 12, 2021

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

By Brooke M Wilner; Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.

Andrei Iancu, Director of the American Intellectual Property Law Association’s 2018 annual meeting, has repeatedly stated his desire to give patent owners greater ability to amend claims during AIA trial proceedings. In March 2019, the USPTO took a step in that direction with its pilot program for motion to amend practice. An eligible patent owner who chooses to take advantage of the pilot program can receive valuable preliminary guidance from the Board on its motion to amend, and, if desired, can file a revised motion to amend based on that feedback. Eighteen months after the pilot program’s launch, only a handful of eligible trials have reached final disposition at the Board. In this article, we take a close look at each of these cases to analyze whether and how the Board’s preliminary guidance has impacted their outcome—and provide strategic practice tips for both petitioners and patent owners.

Read the full version of "Insights from the First Year of the USPTO’s New Motion to Amend Pilot Program" here. 

Tags

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), motions to amend (MTA), America Invents Act (AIA)

Downloadable Files

  • PUBLISHED - Chicago-Kent Journal of IP - Insights from the First Year of the USPTOs New Motion to Amend - AKM BMW - 07.12.21

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2814
Email

Originally published in Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property on July 12, 2021.  This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Charitable

Banding Together 2026

June 18, 2026

Washington, DC

Lecture

Munich Licensing Summer Course 2026

June 18-19, 2026

Munich

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

Charitable

TopGolf for the Troops 2026

June 11, 2026

Ashburn

Seminar

3rd AI, IP, & Legal Forum

June 6, 2026

Shangai

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP