直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Damages: “Built-In” Apportionment Using Comparable License Agreements

September 2022

The Licensing Journal

By Daniel C. Cooley; Kathleen Hanley*

Calculating patent damages is “not an exact science.” This is especially true when addressing principles of apportionment. The principle of apportionment seeks to ensure that the patent holder does not obtain an unfair benefit by receiving value for features of the infringing product that are not covered by the asserted patent. It does so by requiring that the patentee “apportion” the damages between the patented feature and all other non-patented features. But determining how to apportion, especially when there is evidence of comparable license agreements, requires careful analysis.

Read "Damages: "Built-In" Apportionment Using Comparable License Agreements"

Tags

damages

Downloadable Files

  • PUBLISHED - The Licensing Journal - Damages_'Built-In' Apportionment Using Comparable License Agreements - DCC KCH - September 2022

Related Practices

Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions

Licensing, Pooling, and Other Transactions

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Related Professionals

Daniel C. Cooley
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2778
Email

*Kathleen Hanley is a law clerk at Finnegan

Reprinted with permission from The Licensing Journal
, published by Wolters Kluwer. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Panel Discussion

2026 Advanced Patent Law Institute

December 3-4, 2026

Stanford

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Conference

LES 2026 Annual Meeting

October 18-21, 2026

San Diego

Conference

2026 FCBA Global Series Fall Session

October 14-16, 2026

Dublin

Conference

2026 AIPPI World Congress

October 7-10, 2026

Hamburg

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Conference

42nd Annual Fall Institute on Intellectual Property Law

September 17-19, 2026

Galveston

Reception

CONNECTails: Networking for Biotech Entrepreneurs & Investors

September 17, 2026

Rockville

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP