August 17, 2020
By Brooke M. Wilner; Karthik Kumar, Ph.D.; Rajeev Gupta, Ph.D.
On July 30, 2020, Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC sued General Dynamics Corp. alleging infringement of its U.S. Patent No. 6,409,599 (the ’599 patent). This is not the first time this patent has been asserted. In fact, this suit is the 43rd time that Virtual Immersion Technologies (VIT) has sued a party alleging infringement of the ’599 patent.
An earlier article in Finnegan’s AR/VR Litigation Update series describes in detail what is claimed by the ’599 patent. Briefly, the patent claims variations to VR systems that allow participants and performers to interact in a VR environment through input/output devices. In other words, the ’599 patent claims multi-participant VR performance theater, one embodiment of which is shown in Figure 3 below:
In earlier complaints, VIT has not typically identified accused AR/VR products by name.1 In its newest complaint, VIT has similarly not identified a specific accused product, alleging that General Dynamics infringes the ’599 patent through its “interactive, real time, virtual reality system[] and its practice method.” Citing General Dynamics’ press releases, which state that General Dynamics is utilizing virtual reality to “break[] away from screens into a hands-free, data-rich workplace,” VIT alleges that General Dynamics’ systems perform each element of at least one claim of the ’599 patent.
VIT asks for a judgment of infringement and monetary damages, including exceptional damages under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
Of the now 43 cases filed by VIT asserting the ’599 patent, 34 have been terminated—26 by voluntary dismissal by VIT and 8 by stipulated dismissal. Each of these represents a likely settlement by VIT. The 9 cases that are still pending, including the case against General Dynamics, have been filed within the past month.
If this case doesn’t settle, we may see General Dynamics answer the complaint, or perhaps move to dismiss the complaint as deficient in some respect. General Dynamics may also take further action against the ’599 patent, including filing a petition for inter partes review challenging the patentability of the patent and claims at issue in this case.
The case is captioned Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC v. General Dynamics Corp., 6:20-cv-00698-ADA (W.D. Tex. 2020).
Endnotes
1 See, e.g., Virtual Immersion Techs. LLC v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 1-20-cv-00966 (N.D. Ill. 2020); Virtual Immersion Techs. LLC v. Jacobs Eng’g Grp., 1-20-cv-00969 (N.D. Ill. 2020); Virtual Immersion Techs. LLC v. M A Mortenson Co., 1-20-cv-00971 (N.D. Ill. 2020); Virtual Immersion Techs. LLC v. Siemens Corp., 1-20-cv-00973 (N.D. Ill. 2020).
Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.
June 10-12, 2024
San Francisco
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
Workshop
Life Sciences Workshop: Updates and Key Trends in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology IP Law
May 2, 2024
Cambridge
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.