直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Attorney Fees, the PTAB and You: Recent Guidance Regarding Section 285 Fees Tied to PTAB Actions

February 18, 2021

Westlaw Today

By Anthony D. Del Monaco; Forrest A. Jones; Joseph M. Myles

Under exceptional circumstances, Section 285 of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C.A. § 285, allows district court litigants to recover attorney fees from patent litigations. In district court litigation, this tool has been available for a long time, and there is significant guidance about when it is and is not appropriate.

However, with the America Invents Act (AIA) expansion of available post-grant procedures before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and the 2014 Octane Fitness decision making awards of attorney fees more available, litigants are increasingly turning to Section 285 even where the exceptional circumstances arise in other procedures.

Read more.

Tags

attorney fees, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), 35 U.S.C. § 285, America Invents Act (AIA)

Downloadable Files

  • PUBLISHED - Westlaw Today - Attorney Fees, the Ptab and You_Rece

Related Practices

Appeals to the PTAB

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Forrest A. Jones
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4019
Email
Joseph M. Myles
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4372
Email

©2021 Thomson Reuters. Originally published by Westlaw Today. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

2027 ABA-IPL Section Annual Meeting – IPLSPRING

April 14-15, 2027

Arlington

Webinar

Data and Market Exclusivity: An Update on China’s New Law and Comparisons to the US and Europe

November 19, 2026

Webinar

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

2026 ANA Masters of Advertising Law Conference

November 2-4, 2026

Huntington Beach

Conference

2026 TIPA International Symposium

October 30, 2026

Taipei City

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Seminar

Future IP UK

October 21, 2026

London

Conference

LES 2026 Annual Meeting

October 18-21, 2026

San Diego

Hybrid Seminar

Annual Intellectual Property Law Section Fall Seminar

October 16, 2026

Alexandria

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP