直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Accelerating Patent Eligibility Decisions at the ITC

September 15, 2021

Westlaw Today

By Eric J. Fues; Ryan V. McDonnell

The United States International Trade Commission’s (ITC or Commission) new Interim Initial Determination (Interim ID) pilot program will address case-dispositive, or at least very substantial, issues prior to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) holding a full hearing on all issues in a Section 337 investigation. The pilot program bridges the gap between the ITC’s 100-day program for early case disposition, and the summary determination stage of an ITC case.

The 100-day program has had some success, primarily for the early investigation of domestic industry allegations. But it has been used much less often for patent-related issues, even though the majority of Section 337 investigations involve patent infringement allegations. Also, in contrast with the prevalence of pleadings-stage rulings in district court patent cases, relatively few ITC investigations have been resolved by summary determination.

This article outlines the Interim ID program and explores its application in an area of patent law that has experienced explosive growth over the last decade, namely patent eligibility challenges under Section 101. This patent law issue, with its focus on the patent claims and specification and involving relatively few factual issues, is well suited for targeted discovery and legal review under the ITC’s new program.

Read the full version of "Accelerating Patent Eligibility Decisions at the ITC" here. 

Tags

patent-eligible, International Trade Commission (ITC), 35 U.S.C. § 101

For more information

  • PUBLISHED - Westlaw Today - Accelerating Patent Eligibility Decisions at the ITC - EJF RVM - 09.15.21

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

ITC Section 337 Investigations and Trials

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Eric J. Fues
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4245
Email
Ryan V. McDonnell
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4167
Email

©2021 Thomson Reuters. Originally published by Westlaw Today. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 3, 2026

Paris

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Conference

IAM Live: SEP Summit Global 2026

September 9-10, 2026

London

Lecture

Resolving Patent Suits Without Settlement Payments

September 3, 2026

Virtual

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP