Ass Armor LLC agreed to settle with Finnegan client Under Armour and stop using or registering any trademark, logo, or name with the words "armor" or "armour". In 2015, Ass Armor filed a complaint seeking declaratory judgment that its "Ass Armor" mark did not infringe Under Armour’s mark and that three of Under Armour’s trademarks should be canceled. Under Armour later filed its own counterclaims for trademark dilution, unfair competition, trademark infringement, and cybersquatting under the Lanham Act and Florida state law.
Finnegan attorney Douglas A. Rettew represented Under Armour. He said, "Under Armour is very pleased with the result of this case, particularly the final consent judgment entered by the court acknowledging Under Armour’s considerable rights in its UNDER ARMOUR, ARMOUR, and various ARMOUR-formative trademarks, and that the use of ASS ARMOR infringes those rights."
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Award/Ranking
World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners on its 2026 Global Leaders List
June 24, 2026
Press Release
London-Based Life Sciences Litigator Jin Ooi Bolsters Finnegan’s Global IP Litigation Capabilities
June 8, 2026
Commentary
May 20, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination
May 11, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.