Ass Armor LLC agreed to settle with Finnegan client Under Armour and stop using or registering any trademark, logo, or name with the words "armor" or "armour". In 2015, Ass Armor filed a complaint seeking declaratory judgment that its "Ass Armor" mark did not infringe Under Armour’s mark and that three of Under Armour’s trademarks should be canceled. Under Armour later filed its own counterclaims for trademark dilution, unfair competition, trademark infringement, and cybersquatting under the Lanham Act and Florida state law.
Finnegan attorney Douglas A. Rettew represented Under Armour. He said, "Under Armour is very pleased with the result of this case, particularly the final consent judgment entered by the court acknowledging Under Armour’s considerable rights in its UNDER ARMOUR, ARMOUR, and various ARMOUR-formative trademarks, and that the use of ASS ARMOR infringes those rights."
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Commentary
Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge
September 11, 2026
Award/Ranking
September 11, 2026
Media Mention
Finnegan Opens First Texas Office with ‘Two Leaders with Genuine Local Roots'
September 7, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.