Partner
Mareesa Frederick 律师的执业重点是复杂的高风险知识产权诉讼,尤其是美国国际贸易委员会(ITC)的337条款诉讼程序。她曾被《The Legal 500 U.S.》评为美国国际贸易委员会专利诉讼的“下一代律师”代表人物。此外,在向客户提供预审策略、战略许可机会和专利组合咨询服务领域,Mareesa也积累了丰富的经验。
Mareesa处理过众多技术领域的诉讼,包括化妆品、医药产品、制造工艺、生物技术、聚合物、半导体芯片和包装、运动疗法设备、可调谐激光器、移动电话、数码相机、电视和电脑显示器、喷墨墨盒、印刷板、LED照明和汽车零件。她还处理过外观设计专利、商标、商业秘密和商业外观索赔等诉讼案件。
在加入本所之前,Mareesa是美国国际贸易委员会的一名高级调查律师,在美国国际贸易委员会的众多337条款案件中担任首席政府法律顾问,涉及机械、电气和消费品相关专利。此外,她还曾在美孚化工薄膜事业部任职,在聚合物加工领域积累了丰富的技术经验,曾在该事业部担任研发工程师和工艺工程师。
Mareesa投入了大量的时间从事无偿法律援助。最近,Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll表彰了她的贡献。她通过华盛顿无家可归者法律诊所(Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless)代理客户,并参与了飞翰的刑事法律援助计划,在华盛顿高等法院为客户提供代理服务。目前,她的无偿法律援助工作的重点是支持有特殊教育需求的儿童,她在飞翰领导建立正式特殊教育项目的相关事宜。
除了飞翰的专利执业外,Mareesa还担任霍华德大学的兼职教授六年,为工程专业的学生教授专利法,还曾在霍华德大学法学院担任兼职教授两年,教授专利法和专利政策课程。Mareesa的卓越贡献获得了《National Law Journal》的认可,该杂志称她为华盛顿地区“冉冉升起的明星”。
重要经历
会员身份
Eli Lilly and Company v. Actavis Labs. UT Inc.
Represented Eli Lilly in patent litigation relating to Cialis®.
1:16-cv-01119, E.D. Va., Judges Nachmanoff, Trenga
Actelion Pharmaceuticals v. ICOS Corp.
Represented ICOS in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceeding involving pharmaceutical formulation.
IPR2015-00561, -00562, PTAB, Judges Mitchell, Snedden, Yang
Eli Lilly and Company v. Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Represented Eli Lilly in an appeal from a PTAB decision in an IPR case.
IPR2014-00693, -00752, PTAB, Judges Green, Prats, Snedden
16-1547, Fed. Cir., Judges Bryson, Moore, Newman
Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp. v. POSCO
Defended POSCO in a patent infringement action involving grain oriented steel.
2:12-cv-02429, D.N.J., Judges Cavanaugh, Chesler, Falk, Waldor
15-0112, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, Newman
Arigna Technology Limited v. Volkswagen AG, et al.
337-TA-1267, ITC, Judge Bhattacharyya
IPR2021-01321, -01531, PTAB, Judges Baer, Fenick, Iftikhar
2:21-cv-00054; -00172, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
337-TA-1052; 337-TA-1073, ITC, Judges Lord, Pender, Bullock
IPR2017-01494, -01495, -01537, -01538, -01539, PTAB, Judges Droesch, Weiker, Hudalla
Articles
The Injury Requirement in ITC Section 337 Investigations The Injury Requirement in ITC Section 337 Investigations
July 2023
LexisNexis Practical GuidanceArticles
Working with OUII – The Staff Attorney’s Role and Practical Guidance on Interacting with the Staff Attorney Working with OUII – The Staff Attorney’s Role and Practical Guidance on Interacting with the Staff Attorney
July 2023
LexisNexis Practical GuidanceEvent
Day in the Life of a Patent Attorney Day in the Life of a Patent Attorney
July 12, 2023
Webniar
"Frederick has a sterling track record at the ITC, where she previously worked as a senior investigative attorney."
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
“Mareesa Frederick is 'deeply familiar with the ITC practice and greatly contributes to the resolution of complicated problems, which occasionally arise during ITC proceedings.’”
Legal 500 United States
“Frederick, who also benefits from inside knowledge, recently won a rare complete victory on summary determination for REC Solar Holdings as respondent in a high-profile investigation involving solar cells.”
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
"Frederick has a sterling track record at the ITC, where she previously worked as a senior investigative attorney."
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
“Mareesa Frederick is 'deeply familiar with the ITC practice and greatly contributes to the resolution of complicated problems, which occasionally arise during ITC proceedings.’”
Legal 500 United States
“Frederick, who also benefits from inside knowledge, recently won a rare complete victory on summary determination for REC Solar Holdings as respondent in a high-profile investigation involving solar cells.”
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
Press Release
Finnegan Receives Top Rankings from Intellectual Asset Management; 46 Attorneys Ranked Finnegan Receives Top Rankings from Intellectual Asset Management; 46 Attorneys Ranked
June 30, 2023
Intellectual Asset ManagementPress Release
The Legal 500 Ranks Finnegan a Top Tier Firm for 2023 The Legal 500 Ranks Finnegan a Top Tier Firm for 2023
June 12, 2023
The Legal 500Press Release
45 Finnegan Attorneys Recommended by Intellectual Asset Management; Firm Continues to Be Top Ranked 45 Finnegan Attorneys Recommended by Intellectual Asset Management; Firm Continues to Be Top Ranked
July 8, 2022
Intellectual Asset ManagementPress Release
Finnegan Continues to Be Ranked a Top Tier Law Firm in The Legal 500 United States 2022 Edition Finnegan Continues to Be Ranked a Top Tier Law Firm in The Legal 500 United States 2022 Edition
June 8, 2022
The Legal 500Commentary
It's Another First for ALJs at the International Trade Commission It's Another First for ALJs at the International Trade Commission
April 19, 2022
The National Law JournalCommentary
Minority in IP: Navigating a Lonely Road Minority in IP: Navigating a Lonely Road
March/April 2022
Washington LawyerDue to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.