In the Federal Circuit’s first decision on a covered business method (CBM) patent appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), the court ruled in favor of Finnegan client SAP America, upholding the PTAB’s ruling that Versata Development Group’s product-pricing patent was invalid for claiming on abstract ideas. The Federal Circuit ruled that petitioners in CBM reviews can argue that a patent covers only abstract ideas and other things that are not patent eligible under § 101. As a result, the court rejected Versata’s argument that such challenges are unavailable. Finnegan attorney Erika H. Arner argued the appeal on behalf of SAP. She said, "We are pleased with the affirmance for SAP," the company's attorney Erika H. Arner of Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP said Thursday. "In a broader sense, the court showed an interest in and gave guidance on a number of issues of first impression, and that's a good thing for the patent office, patent owners and challengers who are trying to understand how this process will work."
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Award/Ranking
Managing IP Americas Awards 2024: Finnegan Shortlisted for Nine Awards, Including Firm of the Year
March 12, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.