January 19, 2017
Bloomberg BNA
On January 18, 2016, during oral argument in Lee v. Tam, the Supreme Court suggested that arguments that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) can ban disparaging trademark registrations could be used to justify withholding copyright registration from books with objectionable content. In Lee v. Tam, the USPTO refuses to register Simon Shiao Tamn's trademark application for his band named "the Slants," saying the mark is disparaging to Asians. Tam argues that his desire to register the name is a salute to his Asian heritage and takes a stand against bigotry. Claims around free speech have been called into question as a result of this case. Bloomberg BNA reached to Finnegan partner Mark Sommers for his thoughts on the case.
Sommers said, "This case involves a very interesting use of a trademark—to ‘take back’ a slur—and what happens when you try to graft that purpose onto the trademark statute. The statute wasn't originally designed to protect speech. It's a consumer protection statute to protect against confusion when buying products."
Press Release
February 13, 2024
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Tops the 2024 World Trademark Review 1000, Receiving New Regional Accolade
February 13, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.