直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Workshop

Advanced IP Workshop—How Chinese Companies Effectively Handle and Deter NPE Litigation

December 3, 2015

Shenzhen, China

Finnegan’s Shanghai office cordially invites you to attend the next seminar in our exclusive Advanced Intellectual Property Seminar Program series. Co-hosted by the Shenzhen Patent Association, the program features Finnegan attorneys Lionel Lavenue and Linda Thayer who will discuss how Chinese companies can effectively handle and deter litigation brought by a non-practicing entity (NPE).

NPEs continue to dominate the patent infringement landscape in the United States, particularly for Chinese companies. Please join us for a discussion of the latest strategies (both in the courts and before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office) to defeat claims of patent infringement by NPEs in the United States, as well as a review of the recent proposals for patent reform.

Topics include:

  • Tips and techniques for winning as a defendant in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (E.D. Tex.), especially as a defendant located in Asia, and the use of special procedures to level the playing field for litigation in this particular court
  • Motions to dismiss based on patent-ineligible subject matter, and how courts have addressed such motions since the U.S. Supreme Court’s Alice decision
  • How to prepare an effective petition for inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review of covered business method patents (CBM)
  • Real-party-in-interest: Who must be named in the petition?
  • Patent litigation reform: What is being discussed and what may actually be enacted?

Finally, case studies showing how Chinese companies can effectively use IPR to settle NPE cases will be discussed. Please join us for this important discussion.

Agenda:

13:00 - 13:30 Registration
13:30 - 13:40 Welcome Remarks
13:40 - 15:00 Dealing with NPEs—Legislation and Litigation
15:00 - 15:20 Tea Break
15:20 - 16:30 Effective IPR Strategies Under Litigation and Negotiation Discussions
16:30 - 17:00 Case Studies on How to Effectively Use IPR to Settle NPE Cases
17:00 - 17:30 Q&A

RSVP:

RSVP by 30 November 2015 to ipeventshanghai@finnegan.com
For more information, please contact us at
021-61942067

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Related Professionals

Lionel M. Lavenue
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2750
Email

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Claim Disclaimer Derails Instituted IPR in Freightcar America

May 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP