印庆余

合伙人

+1 202 408 4213 +1 202 408 4213
qingyu.yin@finnegan.com qingyu.yin@finnegan.com

901 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001-4413

vCard

查看印律师的工作范围

印庆余律师在处理各种知识产权纠纷，包括美国国际贸易委员会（ITC）的337调查、联邦地方法院专利诉讼、仲裁、调停和谈判方面具有丰富的经验。他常常在这类争议处理中担任首席律师。他已成功地为智能手机、电子通信和医疗器械领域的多家中国客户解决了数起高风险纠纷。

印律师也同样帮助客户开发和管理重要的专利组合。其丰富的专利诉讼经验为战略性地准备和提交美国乃至世界范围的专利申请、为客户决定在美国市场推出产品之前做相应的风险分析提供了指导。他因在专利许可和交易以及ITC专利诉讼的杰出成绩被《The Legal 500 U.S.》收录，其工作的技术领域相当广泛，包括电子通信、电子、电路、医疗器械、无人车、个人运载器（平衡车）、半导体、材料科学、光通信、软件和信息技术。他曾担任主要庭审律师并负责调查的各个环节。他代理过的最著名的案件是代表宏达国际电子股份有限公司及其子公司（HTC Corp. and affiliates）应诉苹果（Apple）发起的涉及LTE和图像处理技术的数起ITC调查。

印律师经常访问中国，发表知识产权议题的演说，为知识产权问题提供意见和评估。在争议解决和知识产权资产管理多年的经验和他的中国背景，让他能非常有效且有效率地为中国客户提供咨询服务。

经验

Bell Northern Research, LLC v. HMD America, Inc. et al.

Represented Unisoc Technologies Co. Ltd. in a patent litigation involving mobile phones and tablets. Secured a dismissal of the proceeding under Rule 12 with the Court holding it lacked personal jurisdiction over Unisoc.

1:22-cv-22706, S.D. Fla., Judge Scola

Represented defendant CosMX in a patent infringement case in the Eastern District of Texas involving ATL’s patents related to lithium-ion battery technology. Secured a jury verdict of invalidity in favor of CosMX for two of the three asserted patents.

2:22-cv-00232, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap

Represented intervenors-cross-appellants DJI in Federal Circuit appeal and cross-appeal from ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1133 regarding unmanned aerial vehicles.

21-1082, -1363, Fed. Cir.

Successfully represented petitioner DJI at the PTAB in a series of IPRs against five Synergy Drone patents, resulting in cancellation of all 76 claims related to unmanned aerial vehicles. As a result, Drone-Control dropped its related patent infringement case in the Western District of Texas.

IPR2018-00204, -00205, -00206, -00207, -00208, PTAB, Judges Goodson, Ippolito, Scanlon
1:17-cv-00242, W.D. Tex., Judge Yeakel

Daedalus Blue LLC v. SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. et al.

Successfully represented DJI in a patent litigation involving drone technology and succeeded in getting the entirety of plaintiff’s damages expert’s report excluded under Daubert on the eve of trial, driving a favorable resolution.

6:20-cv-00073, W.D. Tex., Judge Albright

Represented respondent DJI Technology Inc. in patent litigation involving drone technology.

337-TA-1133, ITC, Judge Bullock