直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • 联邦巡回法院知识产权博客
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First博客
  • Events & Webinars
  • 知识产权讯息
  • 播客
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Laura P. Masurovsky

James Barney on the U.S. Supreme Court Term in Review

July 11, 2014

By James R. Barney

Over the last several years, IP cases have reached the U.S. Supreme Court with greater frequency. In the 2013 term, the Supreme Court made several critical decisions in cases that will have a substantial effect on businesses seeking to acquire patents. Finnegan attorney James R. Barney discusses the implications of these Supreme Court decisions.

Downloadable Files

  • SCOTUSTerminReview

Related Practices

全球知识产权维权、诉讼与审判

知识产权申办及组合管理

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

James R. Barney
合伙人
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4412
Email

Related Insights

Webinar

Implementation of Long-Arm Jurisdiction by the UPC Court and German National Courts: Strategic Considerations and Practical Implications

May 12, 2026

Webinar

Articles

The Interplay of Patent Term Extension (PTE) and Reissue: Merck v. Aurobindo and Its Implications, Part I

April 7, 2026

Articles

The Interplay of Patent Term Extension (PTE) and Reissue: Merck v. Aurobindo and Its Implications, Part II

April 7, 2026

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Supreme Court Recalibrates Contributory Copyright Liability

March 30, 2026

IP Updates

Supreme Court Clarifies Limits of Liability for Contributory Copyright Infringement

March 27, 2026

Lecture

Prior Use Before the UPC, the EPO, German, Chinese, and U.S. Courts

March 12, 2026

Virtual

IP Updates

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Thaler v. Perlmutter, Leaving Human Authorship Requirement Intact

March 5, 2026

European IP Blog

Munich Regional Court I Grants Avago Injunction Against Renault After Calculating a FRAND Rate

4 March 2026

Articles

Skinny labels, larger risks: Supreme Court considers induced infringement standards in Hikma v. Amarin

Skinny Labels, Larger Risks: Supreme Court Considers Induced Infringement Standards in Hikma v. Amarin

March 3, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP