直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • 联邦巡回法院知识产权博客
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First博客
  • Events & Webinars
  • 知识产权讯息
  • 播客
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

U.S. Copyright Office Announces New Rule Governing Designation of Copyright Agents

December 16, 2016

By Margaret A. Esquenet

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) protects eligible internet platforms from secondary liability for copyright infringement under the "safe harbor" of 17 U.S.C. § 512. One condition of safe harbor protection is that any platform seeking protection must designate one or more copyright agents with the U.S. Copyright Office to receive notices from copyright owners claiming infringement.

Recently, the Copyright Office announced a new rule governing designation of such agents to receive notification of claimed infringement. 81 Fed. Reg. No. 211, pp. 75695-75708. Specifically, the Copyright Office is moving from a paper system to a searchable, electronic database of designated agents. All internet platforms seeking continued safe harbor eligibility must update their designated agent information in the new database.

Under the final rule, agents must be re-designated by December 31, 2017, and thereafter will be required to renew or re-designate an agent every three years in order to remain in compliance with § 512(c)(2) of the DMCA. Designations based on the former paper-based system will remain valid only through December 31, 2017, as the new electronic filing system is phased in.

Designation of agents under the new system began on December 1, 2016, under which agent designation fees have been reduced from $105 (plus an additional fee of $35 for groups of alternate names) to $6.

If you have any questions regarding this change to DMCA compliance requirements, please contact Margaret Esquenet.

Tags

Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), United States Copyright Office, infringement

Related Practices

商标及品牌管理

著作权

Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm's clients.

Related Insights

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

Conference

Best Practices and Tech in Intellectual Property Conference 2026

May 17, 2026

Tel Aviv

Articles

COPPA’s Amended Rule Is Now in Full Effect: What Operators Need to Know

May 15, 2026

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Netflix Prevails in Copyright Infringement Suit Regarding Tiger King

May 14, 2026

IP Updates

Tenth Circuit Sides with Netflix in Tiger King Copyright Challenge 

May 5, 2026

Conference

LESI Annual Conference 2026

April 26-29, 2026

Dublin

Conference

2nd AI & IP Forum

April 26, 2026

Munich

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP