直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • 联邦巡回法院知识产权博客
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First博客
  • Events & Webinars
  • 知识产权讯息
  • 播客
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Seminar

New Strategies for Patent Prosecution in Europe and the U.S.

October 13, 2016

Palo Alto, CA

Controlling the pace and direction of patent prosecution has long been a challenge for applicants and their advisers. Backlogs and delays have been highlighted at a number of patent offices around the world as areas of concern. In recent years patent offices have implemented various procedures that allow applicants to have more influence in the pace of prosecution.

Please join us for a discussion of the various measures available at the EPO and USPTO that can allow applicants to control the pace of prosecution, and the resultant consequences that can affect the outcome of the application procedure. We will also discuss how actions in the international phase of a PCT application can affect the pace and direction of prosecution in the regional or national phase. In addition, our panel of European and U.S. patent attorneys will share their practical experience of the various EPO and USPTO initiatives for speeding up prosecution.

Topics will include:

  • European Patent Office Initiatives for Cutting Delays: Accelerated Prosecution (“PACE”); Early Certainty from Search; and Early Certainty from Opposition
  • Making the Most of USPTO Initiatives: Post-Prosecution Pilot Program (“P3”); Track One; and After Final Consideration Pilot 2.0
  • Proactive Prosecution of PCT Applications: International Search and Examination at the European Patent Office
  • Increasing Quality and Reducing Costs by Coordinating Prosecution in Europe and the United States
  • Slowing the Pace of Prosecution and Deferring Costs

Moderator:

Robert F. McCauley
 
Speakers:
Aaron J. Capron 
Philip L. Cupitt Ph. D. 
Martin D. Hyden  

Date:

Thursday, October 13, 2016

Time:
1:30 - 5:30 p.m.

Location:

Palo Alto, California

Who Should Attend:

General counsel and in-house patent counsel with responsibility for/interest in protecting a company’s intellectual property

MCLE Credit:

Finnegan confirms that this activity has been certified for 2.5 hours of California MCLE For more information, please contact Finnegan IP Programs.

Related Practices

专利局无效程序

欧洲专利异议和上诉

知识产权申办及组合管理

专利撰写与申办

Related Professionals

Aaron J. Capron
合伙人
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6680
Email

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Lecture

Munich Licensing Summer Course 2026

June 18-19, 2026

Munich

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP