直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • 联邦巡回法院知识产权博客
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First博客
  • Events & Webinars
  • 知识产权讯息
  • 播客
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Due Process Issues in Veterans’ Cases after Cushman v. Shinseki

January 12, 2010

Webinar and Washington, DC

ABA Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice

The American Bar Association Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice and Finnegan will host a panel discussion exploring the impact of the recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Cushman v. Shinseki. In Cushman, the Federal Circuit became the first court to hold that persons who are mere claimants for government benefits are entitled to constitutional due process protections. The panel will discuss the Cushman decision; a subsequent Federal Circuit decision in Edwards v. Shinseki; what due process protections the VA may be required to provide; and the potential implications for other government agencies and claimants. To register to attend this event, please click here.

Related Practices

全球知识产权维权、诉讼与审判

联邦巡回法院和最高法院上诉

Related Professionals

James R. Barney
合伙人
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4412
Email

Related Insights

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Lecture

Munich Licensing Summer Course 2026

June 18-19, 2026

Munich

Charitable

TopGolf for the Troops 2026

June 11, 2026

Ashburn

Articles

California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data

June 4, 2026

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP