Associate
Shivani Karthikeyan focuses on patent litigation, client counseling, and intellectual property (IP) due diligence. She represents large, brand-name pharmaceutical companies in complex litigation, drawing from her technical background in biology as well as her experiences interning at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), and a large biotechnology/pharmaceutical company to inform a diverse perspective in patent law.
Shivani practices all aspects of U.S. patent law, with an emphasis on litigation, client counseling, and transactional matters. Her technical experience focuses on the life sciences, including biotechnology and pharmaceuticals.
Shivani represents brand-name innovators in Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) pharmaceutical patent litigation and advises clients on patent and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory issues. She has significant experience supporting life sciences transactions, including due diligence, licensing agreements, and other IP-related transactions. Shivani has authored articles on topics related to IP and life sciences transactions, including license agreement drafting, retroactive sublicensing, and implied licenses by estoppel.
Shivani began her legal career at Finnegan as a summer associate and law clerk, where she conducted legal research and composed memoranda across a range of technical areas. She supported litigation and IP due diligence matters, and contributed to a book chapter on Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) litigation.
During law school, Shivani interned for the Honorable Kara Stoll at the CAFC, where she drafted research and bench memoranda, assisted with opinion writing, and attended oral arguments. Shivani also interned in the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII) at the ITC, where she conducted research on various topics in ITC practice and drafted an institution memorandum. As an IP intern at a large pharmaceutical company, she conducted landscape analyses, research, and presented on FDA regulations and biotechnology patents.
Shivani served as president of The George Washington University Law School’s Student Intellectual Property Law Association (SIPLA). She was also a member of her law school’s Moot Court Board and the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) Quarterly Journal. Shivani places high value on giving back to those in need whenever possible and prioritizes maintaining a robust pro bono practice.
Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation v. Shanghai Auzone Biological Technology Co., Ltd et al.
Representing Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma in litigation matters related to Radicava ORS (edaravone) used to treat patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
2:25-cv-03326, D.N.J., Judge Cecchi
1:23-cv-00759, D. Del., Judges Burke, Connolly, Hall
1:24-cv-01423, D. Del., Judge Hall
1:24-cv-00549, D. Del., Judge Hall
Certain Drug Products Containing C-Type Natriuretic Peptide Variants, and Components Thereof
Representing respondent Wacker Biotech GmbH in a rare section 337 ITC investigation involving drug products containing C-type natriuretic peptide variants.
337-TA-1447, ITC, Judge Cheney
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Lexeo Therapeutics, Inc., et al.
Represented Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in district court litigation involving claims of trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract against individual and corporate defendants and relating to complex treatments for genetic disorders. Successfully opposed motion to dismiss key claims and obtained settlement with all defendants following completion of fact discovery.
1:23-cv-09000, S.D.N.Y., Judges Castel, Aaron
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Upholds Prosecution Laches in Ruling Against Gilbert Hyatt Federal Circuit Upholds Prosecution Laches in Ruling Against Gilbert Hyatt
October 20. 2025
Articles
Case Summary: The Presumption Against Retroactive Licensing Absent Explicit Language to the Contrary Applies Equally to Sublicenses Case Summary: The Presumption Against Retroactive Licensing Absent Explicit Language to the Contrary Applies Equally to Sublicenses
August 29, 2025
LES InsightsArticles
Why the ITC Is a Friendlier Forum for Patent Litigation Why the ITC Is a Friendlier Forum for Patent Litigation
July 11, 2025
World Intellectual Property ReviewArticles
Drafting License Agreements – Best Practices for Definitions Drafting License Agreements – Best Practices for Definitions
February 27, 2025
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – February 2025 Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – February 2025
February 5, 2025
Federal Circuit IP Blog
The Boundary of a Claim Limitation Can Vary Across Different Independent Claims The Boundary of a Claim Limitation Can Vary Across Different Independent Claims
October 9, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.