直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
Naresh Kilaru
Partner
More
vCard
  • 901 New York Avenue, NW
  • Washington, DC 20001-4413
+1 202 408 4236
naresh.kilaru@finnegan.com naresh.kilaru@finnegan.com

Naresh Kilaru

Partner

  • +1 202 408 4236 +1 202 408 4236
  • naresh.kilaru@finnegan.com naresh.kilaru@finnegan.com
  • 901 New York Avenue, NW
  • Washington, DC 20001-4413
  • vCard

Naresh Kilaru, leader of the firm’s trademark practice, counsels clients on brand protection and enforcement strategies in the United States and around the world. His extensive experience in all aspects of trademark, copyright, and unfair competition litigation includes cases involving computer source code, traditional trademarks, product packaging and product configuration trade dress, false advertising, counterfeiting, gray-market goods, and domain names. He is also involved in domestic and international trademark prosecution. Naresh has been named by The Legal 500 U.S. as a Next Generation Partner for trademark litigation as well as ranked regionally for his contributions to the fields of enforcement, litigation, prosecution, and strategy by World Trademark Review (WTR).

Naresh’s broad experience in U.S. district court and appellate litigation includes jury trials, examining witnesses and handling oral arguments, conducting mock trials, taking and defending depositions, coordinating expert discovery, overseeing the design and implementation of trademark surveys, participating in hearings and judicial conferences, negotiating settlements, and representing clients in mediations. He has authored numerous briefs and motions on a wide range of issues, including motions for and against temporary restraining orders, ex parte seizures, asset freezes, expedited and ex parte discovery, preliminary injunctive relief, summary judgment, and appeals. Naresh has also litigated numerous cases at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

 

Prior to joining Finnegan, Naresh served as in-house counsel at Turner Broadcasting System. He advised internal business clients on all aspects of copyright and entertainment law, including clearances of rights, content agreements, production agreements, distribution agreements, transactional issues, and due diligence.

 

Et Cetera

  • Issue editor of Landslide magazine, the American Bar Association's bimonthly publication on intellectual property law, 2011-present.
  • Fellow of Leadership Council on Legal Diversity, 2016.
  • Served as a writing fellow and was an active member of The George Washington University International Law Review and the Moot Court Board while in law school, 2000-2002.

Experience

Marilyn D. Mintz v. Subaru of America, Inc.

At the lower court, Finnegan prevailed on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion for client Subaru of America. In that suit, the plaintiff asserted trademark and copyright infringement, trademark dilution, and false advertising against Subaru’s annual “Share the Love” holiday-season campaign, which donates money from car purchases to various buyer-designated national and local charities. Subaru’s campaign uses a particular logo comprised of a heart on a hand, and various other “love”-themed designs.

The plaintiff sought enhanced damages, punitive damages over $20 million, and attorneys’ fees. Subaru’s motion to dismiss was based largely on the facial dissimilarities between the parties’ respective designs, which the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted on all counts asserted in the complaint, without leave to further amend.

The plaintiff appealed to the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed the lower court’s decision after finding that the plaintiff did not plausibly allege any claim. The appeals court later denied plaintiff’s petition for rehearing. Consistent with the lower court’s opinion, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the marks at issue were so facially dissimilar that they could not plausibly create a likelihood of confusion, and affirmed the dismissal of the trademark dilution, copyright infringement, and false advertising claims for the same reasons, resulting in a complete win for Subaru.

16-16840, 9th Cir., Judges Lucero, Owens, Thomas
3:16-cv-03384, N.D. Cal., Judge Chesney

LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. v. Xiaowen

Obtained a temporary restraining order and asset freeze order against 22 defendants accused of selling counterfeit mobile headsets.  Secured an award of over $168 million in damages and obtained default judgment against 17 defendants for trademark counterfeiting, trademark infringement, trademark dilution, false advertising, unfair competition, and cybersquatting.  Obtained an award of over $380,000 in attorneys' fees.

3:16-cv-01162, S.D. Cal., Judges Sammartino, Stormes

Ashe v. The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

Finnegan client PNC uses the mark SPENDOLOGY for online budgeting tools, and a third-party company, Spendology LLC, simultaneously began “using” the identical mark for virtually identical services. In an attempt to take advantage of the near-simultaneous adoption of the mark, the plaintiff repeatedly tried to extort money from PNC, alleging common law trademark infringement. This case was initially litigated at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), where PNC prevailed on a motion for summary judgment on the issue of trademark priority. The TTAB ruled in favor of PNC, finding PNC had prior rights in the mark. A suit was then filed in federal court seeking an injunction and $120 million in damages. Between the time when the TTAB made its ruling and the time when the plaintiff filed suit, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in the B&B Hardware case, which held that TTAB decisions on issues of likelihood of confusion could have issue preclusive effect. Given that decision, Finnegan filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s claims on collateral estoppel grounds in view of the prior TTAB decision on the issue of “priority of use.” The presiding judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland ruled in favor of PNC in a complete victory on the motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s lawsuit. This was one of the first cases to apply the Supreme Court’s decision in B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, regarding the preclusive effect of TTAB decisions, and was the first to consider how that decision applies to issues other than likelihood of confusion. The case was appealed to the Fourth Circuit, where it was dismissed after briefing on a procedural ground, only to be reinstated and taken up on the merits. The Fourth Circuit squarely affirmed the district court ruling on the ground that the issue of priority decided by the TTAB was identical to the issue of priority presented to the district court. Finally, the plaintiff requested a writ of certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court, which was denied.

15-2566, 4th Cir., Judges Keenan, King, Wilkinson
8:15-cv-00144, D. Md., Judge Grimm

Shell Oil Co. v. Warren Unilube, Inc.

Served as second chair counsel for Shell Oil in trade dress infringement litigation that settled successfully the day before trial.

4:09-cv-02851, S.D. Tex., Judge Ellison

Pucci International, Ltd. v. Emilio Pucci International B.V.

Served as first chair counsel for fashion house Emilio Pucci in successful litigation against company attempting to register a similar name at the USPTO.

Opp. No. 92047394, TTAB, Judge Vogler

Sony Group Corporation v. Neil A. Campbell

On behalf of client Sony Group Corporation, Finnegan filed an opposition at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) against an application for SONISTREAM, which was to be used for downloadable computer software for Internet and broadcast radio scheduling and audio playout. The Board found in Sony’s favor on the dilution claim without needing to reach the likelihood of confusion claim, finding that the SONY mark is “exceedingly famous” and “among the most widely recognized marks in the United States.”

Opp. No. 91245851, TTAB, Judges Zervas, Lykos, Larkin

More

Insights

Articles

Your Best Bet for Enforcement: Schedule A Cases or Section 337 Investigations?

Your Best Bet for Enforcement: Schedule A Cases or Section 337 Investigations? Your Best Bet for Enforcement: Schedule A Cases or Section 337 Investigations?

November 27, 2025

World Trademark Review

Conference

FICPI 21st Open Forum FICPI 21st Open Forum

October 2-7, 2023

London

Conference

FICPI 2022 World Congress FICPI 2022 World Congress

September 25-29, 2022

Cannes

Webinar

Managing Trademark Enforcement Matters: What In-House Counsel Needs to Know Managing Trademark Enforcement Matters: What In-House Counsel Needs to Know

July 21, 2022

Webinar

Webinar

Wanting Something Does Not Give You the Right to Have It – Protecting Your Brands and Copyrights Wanting Something Does Not Give You the Right to Have It – Protecting Your Brands and Copyrights

April 15, 2021

Webinar

Articles

Trademarks – What Game Developers Should Know

Trademarks – What Game Developers Should Know Trademarks – What Game Developers Should Know

March 29, 2021

International Game Developers Association
Download
More

Professional Recognition

"Captaining the trademark group, Naresh Kilaru is in high demand for his 'ingenious and effective strategies. He can be highly recommended for his professionalism, knowledge, and responsiveness. His strong communication skills and commitment to client satisfaction make him an exceptional choice for any trademark-related legal matters.' His expertise has earned the trust of prestigious brands, including Sony, whom he represents in the policing and enforcement of the SONY house mark."

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

"A well-rounded IP practitioner, Kilaru excels in both contentious and non-contentious matters, making him a top choice for high-profile clients like Caterpillar, to whom he provides strategic advice and counsel."

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

"Naresh is a great partner to have on your side. He brings extensive litigation experience and is an effective communicator."

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

"Brand counsellor and enforcement expert Naresh Kilaru adds unfair competition, trade secret and right of publicity issues to his strong trademark and copyright repertoire. Equally comfortable with cross-border registrations as district court litigation, Kilaru is another jack-of-all-trades on Finnegan’s very deep bench."

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

“Naresh Kilaru is a Swiss Army knife of a trademark lawyer, who applies the right skills to the right tasks in an impressive display of efficiency.”

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

“Naresh, as a team lead, will deliver the most from his team…at the same time he is conscious in keeping the cost low. He makes himself available for discussion even at a short notice.”

Legal 500 United States

“‘Naresh is great for the most sophisticated trademark matters affecting your key brands. His skills are formidable; in litigation, for example, he demonstrates a complete knowledge of the facts and the law and is able to think on his feet. Through creative strategies and aggressive discovery, Naresh can negotiate favourable outcomes before cases proceed to trial. He is a fierce advocate but keeps clients’ business interests in mind through a case. On the portfolio side, he is outstanding and gives common sense, commercially guided answers to complex questions.’”

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

“Naresh has a refined and evolved understanding of U.S. trademark law. His articulation of issues and solutions set out in briefs is highly impressive. Naresh’s arguments are logical and well-reasoned and communicated with such a degree of clarity that it is obvious he has a gift for legal writing. His litigation skills are deserving of the same praise and his performance at trial is formidable. Naresh projects assuredness and has a distinguished presence; he firmly grasps the complex facts and laws governing a case, while also thinking quickly on his feet.”

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

"Captaining the trademark group, Naresh Kilaru is in high demand for his 'ingenious and effective strategies. He can be highly recommended for his professionalism, knowledge, and responsiveness. His strong communication skills and commitment to client satisfaction make him an exceptional choice for any trademark-related legal matters.' His expertise has earned the trust of prestigious brands, including Sony, whom he represents in the policing and enforcement of the SONY house mark."

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

"A well-rounded IP practitioner, Kilaru excels in both contentious and non-contentious matters, making him a top choice for high-profile clients like Caterpillar, to whom he provides strategic advice and counsel."

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

"Naresh is a great partner to have on your side. He brings extensive litigation experience and is an effective communicator."

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

"Brand counsellor and enforcement expert Naresh Kilaru adds unfair competition, trade secret and right of publicity issues to his strong trademark and copyright repertoire. Equally comfortable with cross-border registrations as district court litigation, Kilaru is another jack-of-all-trades on Finnegan’s very deep bench."

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

“Naresh Kilaru is a Swiss Army knife of a trademark lawyer, who applies the right skills to the right tasks in an impressive display of efficiency.”

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

“Naresh, as a team lead, will deliver the most from his team…at the same time he is conscious in keeping the cost low. He makes himself available for discussion even at a short notice.”

Legal 500 United States

“‘Naresh is great for the most sophisticated trademark matters affecting your key brands. His skills are formidable; in litigation, for example, he demonstrates a complete knowledge of the facts and the law and is able to think on his feet. Through creative strategies and aggressive discovery, Naresh can negotiate favourable outcomes before cases proceed to trial. He is a fierce advocate but keeps clients’ business interests in mind through a case. On the portfolio side, he is outstanding and gives common sense, commercially guided answers to complex questions.’”

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

“Naresh has a refined and evolved understanding of U.S. trademark law. His articulation of issues and solutions set out in briefs is highly impressive. Naresh’s arguments are logical and well-reasoned and communicated with such a degree of clarity that it is obvious he has a gift for legal writing. His litigation skills are deserving of the same praise and his performance at trial is formidable. Naresh projects assuredness and has a distinguished presence; he firmly grasps the complex facts and laws governing a case, while also thinking quickly on his feet.”

World Trademark Review WTR 1000

News

Commentary

Permanent Injunction Granted to USA Weightlifting Inc., Enjoining Use of Protected Marks Permanent Injunction Granted to USA Weightlifting Inc., Enjoining Use of Protected Marks

April 24, 2026

IP Law Daily

Commentary

Grambling, After 30 Years, Separates from Pack to Trademark ‘G’ Grambling, After 30 Years, Separates from Pack to Trademark ‘G’

April 15, 2026

Bloomberg Law

Commentary

How Instagram’s ‘PG-13’ Branding for Teens Unraveled How Instagram’s ‘PG-13’ Branding for Teens Unraveled

March 31, 2026

The New York Times

Award/Ranking

In the 2026 World Trademark Review 1000, Finnegan Called “The Best of the Best” In the 2026 World Trademark Review 1000, Finnegan Called “The Best of the Best”

February 2, 2026

World Trademark Review

Commentary

Motion Picture Trade Group Pans Instagram’s Use of “PG-13” with Cease and Desist Motion Picture Trade Group Pans Instagram’s Use of “PG-13” with Cease and Desist

November 5, 2025

The Wall Street Journal

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Remains a Top Tier Firm in the 2025 Legal 500 Rankings Finnegan Remains a Top Tier Firm in the 2025 Legal 500 Rankings

June 11, 2025

The Legal 500
More

Professional Activities

  • District of Columbia Bar Association
    (member, Section on Intellectual Property Law, 2002-present)
  • U.S. Council for International Business
    (member, Intellectual Property Committee, 2008-present)
  • American Bar Association
    (chair, IP Transactions & Licensing Committee, Section on Intellectual Property Law, 2013-2017; vice chair, Trademark Litigation Committee, Section on Intellectual Property Law, 2012-2015)
  • Intellectual Property Owners Association
    (member, U.S. Trademark Law Committee, 2012-present)
  • International Trademark Association
    (member, Young Practitioners Committee, 2014-2015)
  • International Federation of Intellectual Property Attorneys (FICPI)
    (chair, Trademark Committee, 2022-2023)
  • American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA)
  • Coalition Against Counterfeiting and Piracy, U.S. Chamber of Commerce
  • National Asian Pacific American Bar Association
  • National South Asian Bar Association
Admissions and Education

Admissions

  • District of Columbia
  • New York
  • Massachusetts
  • U.S. District Court, D. Massachusetts
  • U.S. District Court, S.D. New York
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, District of Columbia

Education

George Washington University Law School
J.D., 2002
Harvard University
B.A., Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, magna cum laude, 1999

Languages

  • Hindi
  • Urdu
  • Telugu

Naresh's Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
Advertising
Copyright
Domain Name Litigation and UDRPs
Patent Litigation and Trials
Trade Secrets
Trademark Litigation and Trials
Trademark Oppositions and Cancellations
Prosecution and Portfolio Management
Advertising
Copyright
Trade Secrets
Trademark Counseling and Prosecution
Trademark and Brand Management
Advertising
Copyright
Domain Name Litigation and UDRPs
Trademark Counseling and Prosecution

Naresh's Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
Electrical and Computer Technology
Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
Manufacturing
Textiles
Consumer Goods and Services
Consumer Products
Energy
Oil and Gas
Transportation and Logistics
Aerospace, Aviation, and Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP