直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Webinar

Strategic Section 112 Considerations for Japanese Companies in the Hi-tech and Bio-pharm Industries

August 20, 2020

Webinar

View Webinar

35 U.S.C. § 112 of U.S. patent law outlines several requirements of a U.S. patent, and they are important considerations for drafting and prosecuting a patent application as well as litigating a patent.  With the advent of new technologies, we have been faced with new challenges in complying with the long-standing requirements.  This is true for Japanese companies involved in the fields of hi-tech and bio-pharm. 

This webinar will discuss strategic considerations in complying with Section 112 requirements.  We will address a few of the requirements from hi-tech and bio-pharm perspectives.

Topics to be discussed include:

  • Written Description Support for Antibody Claims
  • Functional Claiming for the Hi-tech Industry
  • Other Key Strategic Considerations

This webinar will be presented in Japanese.

Recorded: View On Demand

Speakers:
Chiaki Kobayashi
Naoki Yoshida

Time:
10:00 – 11:00 a.m. Japan

Tags

antibodies, functional claiming, Japan, patent application, Written description (35 USC § 112)

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Life Sciences

Pharmaceutical

Biologics

Related Professionals

Chiaki Kobayashi
Partner
Tokyo
+ 813 3 431 6525
Email
Naoki Yoshida
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 6057
Email

Related Insights

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Charitable

TopGolf for the Troops 2026

June 11, 2026

Ashburn

Seminar

3rd AI, IP, & Legal Forum

June 6, 2026

Shangai

Articles

California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data

June 4, 2026

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP