直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

What Type of Application Is This? Using Series Codes to Identify the Type of USPTO Application

December 24, 2015

Authored and Edited by Adriana L. Burgy; Stephanie M. Sanders

Patent applications filed with the USPTO are given a serial or application number in the format of XX/YYY,YYY. The first two digits before the slash (the “XX”) are the series code and the six digits after the slash (the “YYY,YYY”) are the serial or application number. The USPTO added the first series code, fittingly “1”, to patent application serial numbers in 1915.

Different series codes are used for different types of patent applications (e.g., utility application) and proceedings (e.g., ex parte reexamination).  The following chart provides the series code(s) that correspond to each type of patent application or proceeding. 

Series Code(s) Application or Proceeding Type
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 Utility, Plant, and Reissues
29 Design
60, 61, 62 Provisional
35 International Design Application (IDA)
96 Supplemental Examination and resulting Ex Parte Reexamination (if instituted)
90 Ex Parte Reexamination
95 Inter Partes Reexamination

Patent application serial numbers are generally assigned chronologically.  For provisional applications, utility applications, design applications, and reissue applications, the series code also provides information about the year in which an application was filed. For example, utility patent applications having series code “13” were most likely filed in 2012, 2013, or 2014. The USPTO notes, however, that there are some applications for which the serial number and filing date may not fall within the time period you would expect, so it is not a perfect system.

For a list of years when certain series codes were used, check out the USPTO’s Table of Filing Years and Patent Application Serial Numbers, for Patent Applications Filed Since 1882 -- for selected document types.

More information about series codes and application numbers can be found in MPEP 503.

Tags

patent application, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Related Practices

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Contacts

Adriana L. Burgy
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4345
Email

Copyright © 2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

ChIPs Global Summit 2026

October 21-23, 2026

Los Angeles

Conference

2026 FCBA Global Series Fall Session

October 14-16, 2026

Dublin

Webinar

PTAB Developments and Their Impact on Parallel Litigation: Strategic Considerations

August 26, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

A Year of Change for Post-Grant Patent Challenges: Key PTAB and CRU Developments, and Strategic Implications

August 19, 2026

Webinar

Seminar

IAM and WTR Live: Australasia IP Forum 2026

August 11, 2026

Melbourne

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in May 2026

July 31, 2026

Articles

The PTAB Under the Squires Administration: New Trends in Discretionary Denial and Implications for Corporate Practice

July 2026

Articles

Blaker v. NetScout Systems: A Narrow Reading of the Pen Register and Trap and Trace Provisions of the California Invasion of Privacy Act in California State Court

July 29, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP