直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

USPTO Releases Examiner Training Materials on Prior Art under the First-Inventor-to-File System

August 22, 2013

One of the biggest AIA changes to affect patent examiners (and applicants) is the transition from a first-to-invent to a first-inventor-to-file system. To assist with this transition, the USPTO has been rolling out a series of examiner training materials along with a training timeline that outlines training programs that extend into FY 2014. The latest training materials provide in-depth explanations and examples for an examiner to analyze the novelty of a claimed invention.

Of particular note, the training materials include a “FITF Comprehensive Training Definition Sheet” that defines key AIA terms. Among those terms is the “effective filing date.” The first step in the novelty analysis is determining the effective filing date of the claimed invention, which is determined on a claim-by-claim basis. The materials define effective filing date for AIA applications (other than reissue applications) as the earlier of the actual filing date of the application or (2) the filing date of the earliest application for which the application is entitled to a right of foreign priority or the domestic benefit of the earlier filing.

The training materials also include a presentation addressing prior art under the AIA. The presentation outlines the statutory framework and shows how the availability of a disclosure as prior art depends on the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) identify the two types of prior art, and § 102(b) provides exceptions to each category. While most practitioners and examiners are generally familiar with §§ 102(a) and 102(b), the training materials provide concrete examples that illustrate the specifics of applying these rules.

The training materials provide a useful guide to examiners and practitioners alike in navigating the complexities of prior art rejections under the AIA, particularly as the first few Office actions for applications filed under the first-inventor-to-file system are issued and addressed in the coming months.

 

Tags

First to file (FTF)

Copyright © 2013 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 3, 2026

Paris

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates and Remands Infringement and Damages Judgment After Erroneous Verdict Form and Eligibility Analysis

July 8, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 4 of 6: Choosing Between EPR, IPR, PGR, and Reissue

July 1, 2026

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: May 2026

June 30, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP