直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

USPTO Extends Due Dates Through CARES Act

April 2, 2020

Authored and Edited by Adriana L. Burgy

On March 31, 2020, the Director of the USPTO announced that extensions of time would be allowed to file certain patent documents and to pay certain required fees, as a result of temporary authority provided by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act).  Links to the USPTO’s announcement and patent notice are included.

Specifically, the due date for any:

i. reply to an Office notice issued during pre-examination processing by a small or micro entity (e.g., a Notice of Omitted Items, Notice to File Corrected Application Papers, Notice of Incomplete Application, Notice to Comply with Nucleotide Sequence Requirements, Notice to File Missing Parts of Application, and Notification of Missing Requirements);

ii. reply to an Office notice or action issued during examination or patent publication processing (e.g., during examination includes an Office action (either final or non-final) and Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment; publication processing includes a Notice to file Corrected Application Papers issued by the Office of Data Management);

iii. issue fee;

iv. notice of appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 and 37 C.F.R. § 41.31;

v. appeal brief under 37 C.F.R. § 41.37;

vi. reply brief under 37 C.F.R. § 41.41;

vii. appeal forwarding fee under 37 C.F.R. § 41.45;

viii. request for an oral hearing before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under 37 C.F.R. § 41.47;

ix. response to a substitute examiner’s answer under 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(2);

x. amendment when reopening prosecution in response to, or request for rehearing of, a PTAB decision designated as including a new ground of rejection under 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b);

xi. maintenance fee, filed by a small or micro entity; or

xii. request for rehearing of a PTAB decision under 37 C.F.R. § 41.52

that was due between March 27, 2020 and April 30, 2020 (and including those dates), will be extended 30 days from the initial date it was due.  This 30-day extension is provided if the filing is accompanied by a statement that the “delay in filing or payment was due to the COVID-19 outbreak.”  The USPTO defines “a delay in filing or payment due to the COVID-19 outbreak” as where an applicant/practitioner “was personally affected by the COVID-19 outbreak, including without limitation, through office closures, cash flow interruptions, inaccessibility of files or other materials, travel delays, personal or family illness, or similar circumstances, such that the outbreak materially interfered with timely filing or payment.” 

The USPTO also includes a reminder that they are open for filing of documents and fees.  For example, patent documents and fees may be submitted to the USPTO via:  (1) the USPTO’s electronic filing system (EFS-WEB) (MPEP § 502.05); (2) the U.S. Postal Service or with a certificate of mailing (MPEP §§ 513, 512); (3) by hand-delivery to the Customer Service Window (MPEP § 501); and (4) facsimile transmission (MPEP § 502.01).  Since the USPTO remains open for filing of documents and fees, the extension is available “only if the delay was due to the COVID-19 outbreak.” 

As an update, the USPTO released a Frequently Asked Questions and answers regarding the CARES Act extensions of time.  A link to the FAQs can be found here. Notably, the USPTO will continue to update the FAQs as needed with this evolving situation.

Tags

COVID-19, extension of time, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Contacts

Adriana L. Burgy
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4345
Email

Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Charitable

Banding Together 2026

June 18, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP