September 16, 2019
Authored and Edited by Elizabeth D. Ferrill; Adriana L. Burgy
Federal Decision: Curver Luxembourg, SARL, v. Home Expressions, Inc., 2018-2214 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 12, 2019)
Background: Curver originally applied for a design patent directed to an overlapping “Y”-shaped pattern for “Furniture (part of-).” The figures of the application illustrated the pattern, but did not depict any furniture. The examiner allowed the claim but objected to the title as “too vague” and thus failing to designate a particular article for the design, under MPEP § 1503(I). The examiner suggested an amended title, “Pattern for a Chair” and Curver adopted this title (despite the fact that there was no chair shown in any of the figures). In addition, under 37 C.F.R. § 1.153(a), the examiner requested, and Curver agreed, to amend the specification and claim to match the new title.
Curver later sued Home Expressions accusing its baskets of infringing Curver’s design patent. The district court construed the scope of the design patent as limited to the design pattern illustrated in the patent, i.e., to a chair and dismissed the case; here, the ordinary observer would not purchase the Home Expressions’ basket with the “Y” design believing that the purchase was for a “Y” design applied to a chair.
Issue: May claim language specifying an article of manufacture limit the scope of a design patent, even when that article of manufacture is not illustrated the figures?
Outcome: The Federal Circuit held that the claim language can limit the scope of a design patent where the claim language supplies the only instance of an article of manufacture that appears nowhere in the figures. On an alternative ground, the Federal Circuit held that the scope of the design patent in this case was limited by the applicant’s title and claim amendments made during prosecution to secure the patent.
Prosecution Takeaway: There are two important takeaways from this case. First, applicants should be careful when agreeing to title amendments (and therefore the claim amendments) suggested by the examiner, as those amendments could trigger prosecution history estoppel, limiting the scope of the patent when asserted. So, keep in mind that an overly broad title may prompt an examiner rejection leading to prosecution history estoppel. Second, when drafting a design application, it is important to consider the underlying article or articles of manufacture that applicant may wish to apply the claimed design to and ensure that your application reflects those articles. A careful balance is necessary and, in some circumstances, the applicant may need to file more than one application to receive the desired scope of protection.
Copyright © 2019 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
June 10-12, 2024
San Francisco
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
Webinar
May 9, 2024
Webinar
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.