
The USPTO provides their examination guidance and training materials online; a link to the page can be found here. The guidance and materials cover topics such as interview practice, subject matter eligibility, anticipation, obviousness, written description, indefiniteness, and more.
Prosecution Pointer, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), patent application, subject matter eligibility, Automated Interview Request, anticipation, Obviousness (35 USC § 103), Written description (35 USC § 112), indefiniteness (35 USC § 112)
Copyright © 2021 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Reception
Congress 2026: Durable Strategy, Enduring Value – Sustainable IP
September 14, 2026
Manchester
Webinar
PTAB Developments and Their Impact on Parallel Litigation: Strategic Considerations
August 26, 2026
Webinar
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.