直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

Need a Patent Fast? Try Track One

January 15, 2016

Authored and Edited by Matthew J. Hlinka; Adriana L. Burgy

What is Track One?

Track One expedites the examination of a patent application. Once granted, the USPTO strives to reach a final disposition within 12 months.

When can Track One be used?

A nonprovisional utility or plant patent application filed on or after September 26, 2011, is eligible for Track One as long as it:

(A) has no more than four independent claims,

(B) no more than thirty total claims, and

(C) no multiple dependent claims.

Both first filings and continuing applications are eligible for Track One. Reissue applications, however, are not.  But applicant beware - Track One status will be lost if:

(1) applicant petitions for an extension of time;

(2) applicant files an amendment that contains more than four independent claims, more than thirty total claims, or a multiple dependent claim;

(3) applicant files a request for continued examination (RCE);

(4) applicant files a notice of appeal;

(5) applicant files a request for suspension of action;

(6) a final Office Action is mailed;

(7) the application is abandoned; or

(8) examination is completed under 37 C.F.R. § 41.102.

Track One requests must be filed electronically through EFS-Web (plant patent application requests must be field in paper format). And, Track One is not free; standard filing fees must be paid and additionally, there is a Track One prioritized examination fee of $4000 ($2000 for small entities or $1000 for micro entities), and a Track One processing fee.

There is a limit of 10,000 granted requests for Track One per fiscal year. The USPTO’s fiscal year runs from October 1st through September 30th. Although this cap has not yet been hit in Track One’s relatively short history, requests are on the rise. With the number of Track One requests expected to crest 9,000 in fiscal year 2015, the cap may become an issue in coming years.

Why use Track One?

The Track One prioritized examination fee is a substantial sum, but the reduced pendency time is also significant. While the average patent pendency for a standard application is about 27.4 months, Track One applications reach final disposition an average of 7.8 months from filing. Track One applications are also reviewed much earlier, with a first Office Action mailed an average of about 3.4 months after filing, compared to about 18.4 months for standard applications. If speed is the goal, Track One is a great option.

Tags

prioritized examination

Contacts

Matthew J. Hlinka
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4333
Email
Adriana L. Burgy
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4345
Email

Copyright © 2016 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

Reception

12th Annual Georgia Asian Pacific American Bar Association Gala

May 21, 2026

Atlanta

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Virtual Seminar

Patent "Basics" Seminar

May 19, 2026

Virtual

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP