直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

Lessons Learned from the First Year of the PTAB Post-Grant Proceedings: A Three-Part Series

September 16, 2013

Authored and Edited by Clara N. Jimenez; Michele C. Bosch

On September 16, 2012, the post-grant proceedings under the AIA went into effect and became a new tool in the patent practitioner’s toolbox. The much anticipated new PTAB proceedings have clearly sparked a renewed interest for out-of-court patent challenges. In this three-part series, we review the past year of many “firsts” related to these new proceedings and recap the strategies that have been employed and the valuable lessons learned. In Part 1, we look at how IPR petitioners have tipped the “reasonable likelihood” standard in their favor. In Part 2, we recap an exciting year of CBM proceedings, including the first ever CBM oral hearing and decision. Finally, Part 3 offers a glimpse of what supplemental examination offers to patentees and how the proceeding has been utilized so far.

Tags

reasonable likelihood, supplemental examination

Contacts

Michele C. Bosch
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4193
Email

Copyright © 2013 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Reception

2026 IPO Education Foundation Awards Dinner

December 15, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 AIPLA Annual Meeting

October 29-31, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

31st Annual UMass Chan Research Retreat

October 14-15, 2026

Worcester

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Conference

Finnegan IP Summit 2026: Celebrating an Inclusive Talent Pipeline

August 11-13, 2026

Washington, DC

Seminar

IAM and WTR Live: Australasia IP Forum 2026

August 11, 2026

Melbourne

Conference

13th Annual Summit for Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law

July 29-30, 2026

Boston

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP