直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

For the USPTO, Russia Is No Longer a Stop on the PPH

August 4, 2023

Authored and Edited by Adriana L. Burgy; Stacy Lewis†

In March 2022, the USPTO issued a statement terminating relations with the Federal Service for Intellectual Property (“Rospatent”) and with the Eurasian Patent Organization.[1] The USPTO also terminated relations with the National Intellectual Property Office of Belarus. 

As a result, the USPTO will no longer grant requests to participate in the Global Patent Prosecution Highway (GPPH) when such requests are based on earlier examination work performed by Rospatent. In addition, pending cases in which, prior to March 11, 2022, the USPTO granted special status under the GPPH to applications based on work performed by Rospatent, will be removed from special status and returned to regular processing and examination; they will no longer be treated as GPPH applications at the USPTO.

Additionally, applicants filing PCT applications may want to reconsider plans to select Rospatent as an International Searching Authority (ISA) or International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA). The USPTO statement warns that “[d]oing so may prevent successful processing of international applications under the PCT, including the transmittal of required fees through financial institutions.” A notice by the USPTO Office of Policy and International Affairs also warns of US prohibitions on transactions with Russian financial institutions, although the US Treasury Department has authorized certain IP-related transactions in Russia, including the fling and prosecution of any application to obtain a patent, trademark, or copyright, as well as the payment of renewal and maintenance fees.[2]

Those seeking patent protection in Russia should consider whether such effort is justified when enforcement is highly uncertain. As outlined in an earlier post, “Taking a Long-Term View on Russia’s Patent Landscape,” Russia’s Decree 299 allows the government to grant compulsory licensing without any compensation to the patent holder from an “unfriendly” country to Russia, including the United States, Great Britain, European Union members, and Australia. Decree 299 also allows non-authorized distributors to import original goods into Russia without the consent of the right holder.

Endnotes

[1] See, https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/news-updates/uspto-statement-engagement-russia-and-eurasian-patent-organization

[2] https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/OPIA-Bulletin-Russia.pdf

Tags

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Patent Prosecution Highway, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Related Practices

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Contacts

Adriana L. Burgy
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4345
Email

†Stacy Lewis is a Law Clerk at Finnegan.

Copyright © 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

Charitable

TopGolf for the Troops 2026

June 11, 2026

Ashburn

Seminar

3rd AI, IP, & Legal Forum

June 6, 2026

Shangai

Articles

California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data

June 4, 2026

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP