直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

Five Tips for Filing Preissuance Submissions in Design Patent Applications

July 30, 2013

Authored and Edited by Elizabeth D. Ferrill; Michele C. Bosch

Five-Tips-for-Filing-Preissuance-Submissions

Back in April, we outlined the nuts and bolts of the AIA preissuance submission procedure. In short, third parties unrelated to the applicant may submit patents, published applications, and other printed publications to the USPTO for consideration during the examination of a pending application.

Curiously, the USPTO states that a third party may file such a submission for design patent applications. But, design patent applications are not published and remain secret until the design patent issues. So, the opportunity to file a submission would likely be limited to a third party that had prior knowledge of the content of a pending design patent application, either through notice letters, discovery, or closely following a competitor’s recently issued patents.

When a third party does have this knowledge, how can it take advantage of the preissuance submission process for a pending design patent?

  1. Find the application number. The only piece of information that a third party must know to file a preissuance submission is the pending application’s serial number. If the pending application is a continuation of an issued patent, then this information is available under the Continuity Data tab in Public PAIR. Or a third party may know the number from a notice letter or discovery in litigation. Prior to filing, third parties should confirm that the application number is not protected by a confidentiality agreement.
  2. Be prepared to file in paper. Unless the third party has the confirmation number of the pending application, it is not possible to file using the USPTO’s electronic third-party submission system. So, third parties should plan to file the submission in paper.
  3. Use the Form PTO/SB/429. If the submission does not meet the USPTO’s requirements, then it will be rejected. Thus, the USPTO highly recommends using its Form PTO/SB/429, so that important requirements are not overlooked.
  4. Request notification of non-compliance by email. The USPTO offers third parties the opportunity to receive an email if the preissuance submission is rejected. Because third parties cannot see the file wrapper for the pending design application, it is essential to request notification of noncompliance. If the submission is rejected, then the third party may have time to resubmit the materials.
  5. Don’t delay. The preissuance submission must be received at the USPTO before a notice of allowance or first rejection issues. Currently, the USPTO issues the first action in design patent applications in less than a year of filing. Third parties should not delay.  Keep in mind there is no “mailbox rule” for preissuance submissions. The date that matters is the date that the submission arrives at the USPTO.

Tags

preissuance submission, Third-Party Submissions, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Related Practices

Design Rights

Contacts

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email
Michele C. Bosch
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4193
Email

Copyright © 2013 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Charitable

TopGolf for the Troops 2026

June 11, 2026

Ashburn

Seminar

3rd AI, IP, & Legal Forum

June 6, 2026

Shangai

Articles

California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data

June 4, 2026

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP