On June 19, 2015, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) launched an Expedited Patent Appeal Pilot (EPAP) program. The EPAP program’s goal is to reduce the backlog of appealed applications and shorten the pendency of an appeal to the Board.
Typically, patent appeals are taken up by the Board in the order in which they are docketed; the current average pendency of an ex parte appeal is around 30 months. With EPAP, however, appellants who have multiple appeals pending before the Board may file a request to make special one of the pending appeals, therefore expediting its consideration by the Board, on the condition that the appellant withdraws a co-pending appeal in either another application, or an ex parte reexamination with an ex parte appeal.
To participate in EPAP, an appellant must file a petition to make special under 37 C.F.R. 41.3 (Form PTO/SB/438) to the Chief Administrative Patent Judge. The USPTO waives the petition to make special fee in this instance. The petition, however, must be signed by a registered practitioner who has a power of attorney for the application involved in the appeal to be made special and for the application or patent under reexamination involved in the appeal to be withdrawn.
In the petition, appellant must:
The Board’s goal for handling an EPAP application is to:
The USPTO adopted EPAP on a temporary basis, i.e., until two thousand (2,000) appeals have been accorded special status under EPAP, or until June 20, 2016, whichever occurs earlier. As with other pilot programs, the USPTO may extend the pilot program, depending upon its results.
As of September 9, 2015, the USPTO statistics indicate that twenty-one petitions have been filed, with nineteen of those petitions granted. The Board mailed six decisions on appeals made special. On average, the Board renders a decision on a petition to make the appeal special two days after it is filed, and generally renders a decision on the appeal made special one month after the petition is granted.
For more information on the EPAP program at the USPTO website, click here.
Copyright © 2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.