直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • IP Health Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Articles
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
  • Events
  • Webinars
  • Books

Prosecution First Blog

Entity Status: What’s yours?

November 12, 2015

By Neelaabh Shankar, Ph.D.

Edited by Stephanie M. Sanders

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) reduces certain government fees by 50% or 75% to patentees/applicants who qualify as “small entity” or “micro entity,” respectively. Correctly determining applicant status bears not only on fees, but also if entity status is improperly established, it will be considered as a fraud practiced or attempted on the PTO. What’s your entity status? Outlined below are the general requirements for qualifying as a “small” or “micro” entity. 

Small Entity

Establishment of a small entity status permits payment of reduced fees and in particular, a 50% reduction in government fees. There are three classes of applicants who may be eligible for a small entity status:  a person, a business, or a non-profit organization.

Person: A person is eligible for small entity status when there has not been an assignment, grant, conveyance, or license of the invention, and there is no contractual or legal obligation to do so. If the person transferred some of the rights or is under an obligation to transfer a portion of the rights to a person or a business, small entity status may still be applicable if the transferee is also entitled to small entity status.

Business: A business can claim small entity status if the number of its employees and affiliates does not exceed five hundred. Parent companies, subsidiaries, and any other affiliated companies are included in counting the number of employees and affiliates. Also, the business should not have assigned, granted, conveyed, or licensed its rights in the invention to any concern that is not a non-profit organization or a small entity.

Non-Profit: A non-profit organization is entitled to small entity status and includes: a university or an institution of higher education, an organization that falls within the scope of section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, a non-profit scientific or educational organization qualified under 35 U.S.C. § 201 or a foreign nonprofit organization (conditions apply).

Micro Entity

Micro entity status applies to applications filed before, on, or after March 19, 2013. Micro entities must certify as condition for an applicant to be considered a micro entity. Certification must be in writing and must be filed prior to or at the time a fee is first paid in the micro entity amount.

There are two bases for establishing micro entity status: (1) “gross income basis,” and (2) “institution of higher education basis.” Generally, under the “gross income basis,” an applicant:

  1. i) should be a small entity,
  2. ii) must not be an inventor or co-inventor on more than four previously filed patent applications,

iii) the applicant, the inventor, and any joint inventor should not have gross income (as defined by the IRS) exceeding three times the median household income for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the applicable fee is being paid, and

  1. iv) should not have assigned, granted, or conveyed rights to a non-micro entity and should not be under any contractual or legal obligation to do so.

For the “institution of higher education basis,” an applicant:

  1. i) should be a small entity; and
  2. ii) A) applicant’s employer is an institution of higher education; or
  3. B) applicant assigned or is under an obligation to assign the application to such an institution of higher education.

For each basis, there are applicable definitions, e.g., “gross income,” “previously filed applications,” and “institution of higher education.”

Take Home: When claiming small entity or micro entity status, it is advisable to verify eligibility every time a fee is paid. There are circumstances where an applicant may lose small or micro entity status; for example, the number of employees/affiliates increases beyond the 500 limit, the applicant’s income increases due to capital gains or sale of an asset, or the applicant licenses the application to a company that is not a micro entity.

The USPTO resources for Small and Micro Entity Status can be found here.

Tags

patent application, utility patent

Copyright © 2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Webinar

Managing Trademark Enforcement Matters: What In-House Counsel Needs to Know

July 21, 2022

Webinar

Lecture

Understanding Trademarks 2022

July 11-15, 2022

Montreal

Prosecution First Blog

Whither the CCPA? The Influence of CCPA Decisions on Anticipation

July 1, 2022

Webinar

Demystifying Patent Law: Patent Law Basics for Summer Engineering Interns

June 30, 2022

Webinar

Webinar

Part Two - Non-obviousness and Inventive Step in Software, Electronics, and Mechanical Cases: Strategies and Practical Examples for Advancing Prosecution at the USPTO and the EPO

June 29, 2022

Webinar

Panel Discussion

AI and Emerging Technologies Partnership Inaugural Stakeholder Meeting

June 29, 2022

Virtual

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics Through May 31, 2022

June 28, 2022

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – July 2022

June 27, 2022

Prosecution First Blog

Not All Intrinsic Evidence Is Equal

June 24, 2022

Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • EEO Statement

© 2022 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP