直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

AIA Statistics

March 14, 2013

The USPTO recently published updated statistics for filings under the AIA’s new preissuance submission, supplemental examination, and administrative trial provisions. Of note, the USPTO has not received a filing under the Transitional Program for Post-Grant Review of Covered Business Method Patents (CBM TPGR) in more than three months. The CBM TPGR is a proceeding before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), providing for the review of patentability of one or more claims of a “covered business method patent.” The USPTO has received a total of 15 CBM TPGR filings since inception of the program on September 16, 2012.

While CBM TPGR filings have waned, third parties are taking advantage of the preissuance submission process, having submitting nearly 80 such filings in February. Through the preissuance submission process third parties are able to submit “patents, published patent applications, or other printed publications of potential relevance to examination” in pending patent applications for potential consideration by the examiner. 37 C.F.R. § 1.290(a). The USPTO has received a total of 440 preissuance submissions since September 16, 2012.

The USPTO received three supplemental examination requests in February. Supplemental examination allows a patent owner to request a supplemental examination of a patent so that the USPTO can consider, reconsider, or correct information believed to be relevant to the patent. The USPTO has received a total of nine supplemental examination requests since September 16, 2012.

Third parties filed 32 requests for Inter Partes Review (IPR) in February. IPR is a trial proceeding before the PTAB, providing for the review of patentability of one or more claims of a patent following the issuance of a patent or a reissue patent. Third parties have filed a total of 150 petitions for IPR since September 16, 2012.

Additional statistical information about filings under these AIA provisions is available at http://www.uspto.gov/aia_implementation/statistics.jsp.

Tags

supplemental examination, Third-Party Submissions

Copyright © 2013 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms § 102(b) Invalidity; Source Code Commands Are Not Hearsay

May 14, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patents Because Inventorship Could Not Be Corrected Without Giving All Inventors Notice and an Opportunity to Be Heard

April 22, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for December 2025 - February 2026

March 31, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Made in the USA? USPTO Adds Manufacturing and Small-Business Factors to PTAB Discretion

March 13, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in November 2025 to January 2026

March 6, 2026

Articles

D.Mass Patent Litigation Update January 2026 Thumbnail

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: January 2026

February 23, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP