直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

U.S. Trademark Office, Frustrated by Rules Violations, Issues Proposed Rule Requiring Foreign Filers to Engage U.S. Counsel

February 19, 2019

Authored and Edited by Naresh Kilaru; Margaret A. Esquenet

In response to the dramatic rise of foreign applicants filing trademark applications that have inaccurate and possibly fraudulent statements regarding use, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office recently issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking announcing that foreign applicants will no longer be able to represent themselves before the USPTO.  This is a departure from current practice that allows foreign parties to file with the USPTO directly and represent themselves before the TTAB.  The rule is expected to take effect sometime in the fall of 2019.

The proposed rule indicates that in 2017 alone, foreign applicants filed over 115,000 trademark applications at the USPTO, and that over 50,000 of these came from unrepresented foreign parties.  A substantial number of these came from China-based applicants who appear to be filing applications in the U.S. as a result of subsidies offered by China’s municipal governments to spur foreign investment.  Although the USPTO has expressed its concern regarding these filings to Chinese trademark officials, China has indicated it has no ability to control the subsidies offered by the local municipalities.

Under the new rule, foreign parties whose domicile or principal place of business is not located within the U.S. or its territories will need to be represented by licensed U.S. counsel.  Foreign corporations that have a U.S. subsidiary can still have their U.S. subsidiary file applications directly, so long as the subsidiary has a licensed U.S. attorney.  If a foreign applicant files an application in violation of the rule, the USPTO will give the applicant an opportunity to cure the defect by appointing U.S. counsel who will then need to review and attest that the application complies with U.S. law.

At least for the immediate future, foreign applicants will still be allowed to submit Madrid extensions into the U.S. without a U.S. attorney, but will be required to appoint a U.S. attorney if an Office Action issues.  This will likely change once the Madrid filing system is updated to allow for the designation of a U.S. attorney.

The rule will apply to trademark applicants, registrants, and parties to TTAB proceedings.  The proposed rule can be found here.

Tags

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), rule change, fraudulent trademark application

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Contacts

Naresh Kilaru
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4236
Email

Copyright © 2019 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. 
Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Charitable

Banding Together 2026

June 18, 2026

Washington, DC

Lecture

Munich Licensing Summer Course 2026

June 18-19, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP